Abstract:Objective:To investigate the value of MRI in the differential diagnosis of breast masses with a maximum diameter ≤1 cm.Methods:This retrospective study reviewed the preoperative MRI findings of 160 patients with small breast masses in the Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University between September 2012 and December 2018. There were 49 patients with malignant lesions and 111 patients with benign lesions. The mass location, morphological features, time-signal intensity curve (TIC), T2-weighted image features(T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the masses were compared. Student’s t test was used to compare patient age between two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to compare lesion size and ADC value between two groups. The count data (mass location, surrounding fat sign, shape, margin, internal enhancement and TIC type) were compared by χ2 test. The variables like proportion of concurrent contralateral cancer and T2WI features were compared by Fisher exact test. The pairwise comparison in the subgroups was adjusted by Bonferroni. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the age and ADC value was drawn. A binary logistic regression was performed for multivariate analysis using the " Forward: LR" method to establish a diagnostic model for benign and malignant diseases. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of this model were calculated. The nomogram of the model was plotted.Results:(1) Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in surrounding fat sign, margin of mass, internal enhancement, TIC type, T2-weighted image features and ADC values between the benign group and malignant group (χ2=13.083, 11.224, 7.628, 14.060, 21.892; P<0.001, 0.004, 0.006, 0.001, <0.001; Z=-3.952, P<0.001). (2) Multivariate analysis showed that age>50 years old, positive peripheral fat sign, slightly hypointense or peripheral hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images, and ADC value ≤1.22×10-3 mm2/s were independent risk factors for malignancy (OR=6.728, 95%CI: 2.123~21.318, P=0.001; OR=5.545, 95%CI: 1.306~23.533, P=0.020; OR=31.110, 95%CI: 2.167~446.576, P=0.011; OR=13.794, 95%CI: 2.096~90.790, P=0.006; OR=5.802, 95%CI: 1.350~24.938, P=0.018). (3) Differential diagnosis model: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of the diagnostic model combining the above-mentioned characteristics for the differential diagnosis of small breast masses was 89.2%(33/37), 69.4%(59/85), 55.9%(33/59), 93.6%(59/63) and 75.4%(92/122), respectively.Conclusions:Benign and malignant small breast masses overlap a lot in MRI features. It is challenging to make a differential diagnosis based on single feature. The combination of age, surrounding fat sign, T2-weighted image features and ADC values helps to increase the accuracy of diagnosis.

Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Differential Diagnosis of Lymph Node Lesions

Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

MR diffusion-weighted imaging in differential diagnosis of breast lesions with different enhancement shapes or size and parameter selection

Conspicuity of Breast Lesions at Different B Values on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Diagnostic value of ADC and rADC of diffusion weighted imaging in malignant breast lesions]

Differentiation of Clinically Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Predictive Ability of DWI/ADC and DCE-MRI Kinetic Parameters in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Lesions and in Building a Prediction Model.

Diffusion-weighted MRI of the Breast: Lesion Characterization and Parameter Selection

Differential Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging at 3.0 T of Benign and Malignancy Breast Lesions

Value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging on the Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Diseases

A Comparative Study in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Diseases Using DWI Apparent Diffusion Coeffi-Cient and the Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Differentiation Between Malignant and Benign Breast Masses: Combination of Semi-Quantitative Analysis on DCE-MRI and Histogram Analysis of ADC Maps

Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and relative apparent diffusion coefficient values for differential diagnosis of breast lesions

[Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Texture Features in Differentiation of Malignant from Benign Nonpalpable Breast Lesions for Patients with Microcalcifications-Only in Mammography].

The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging combined with apparent diffusion coefficient in the differentiation of benign and malignant diseases of the breast

Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions

[Value of Multiple B-Value Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Masses].

Comparative study of MR diffusion weighted imaging for breast with different b values

Use of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Differentiation of Breast Tumors

Magnetic resonance imaging for differential diagnosis of small breast masses