A Comparative Study in the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Diseases Using DWI Apparent Diffusion Coeffi-Cient and the Relative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
徐琳,汪登斌,王丽君,罗冉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2014.10.002
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the values of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)and relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC)of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)in the diagnosis of breast diseases.Methods:This was a prospec-tive study of the diagnostic value of MR-DWI in differential diagnosis of breast lesions.According to the study inclusion cri-teria:①patients clinically diagnosed breast benign or malignant tumors;②patients verified by histopathological results after MRI examination;③patients without breast biopsy and other interventional procedures before MRI examination;④lesion cross-sectional area bigger than or equal to 25mm2 ;⑤patients of type Ⅱ ~ Ⅳ according to parenchymal classification in ACR criteria (the volume of fibrous glandular tissue bigger than or equal to 25%),220 patients who had a preoperative breast MRI examination including DWI (b=800s/mm2 )were recruited into this study.The ADC values and the rADC val-ues of the breast lesions,contralateral pectoralis major muscle,ipsilateral and contralateral normal breast tissue were meas-ured or calculated.The result of rADC1 was equal to the lesion's ADC divided by the ADC of the contralateral normal breast tissue.The result of rADC2 was equal to the lesion's ADC divided by the ADC of the contralateral pectoralis major muscle. Optimal threshold values of ADC and rADC were explored and the diagnostic values were compared.Results:Two hundred and twenty lesions were confirmed by histopathology,including 105 benign lesions and 115 malignant lesions.While the threshold of lesion ADC value was 1.20×10 -3 mm 2/s,the area under the curve,the sensitivity,the specificity,and the diag-nostic accuracy were 0.923,88.7%,87.6,and 88.2%,respectively.While the threshold of lesion rADC1 value was 0.70, the area under the curve,the sensitivity,the specificity,and the diagnostic accuracy were 0.834,82.6%,70.9%,and 80.9%,respectively.While the threshold of lesion rADC2 value was 0.81,the area under the curve,the sensitivity,the spe-cificity,and the diagnostic accuracy were 0.873,83.5%,78.1%,and 81.0%,respectively.Conclusion:ADC and rADC val-ues are valuable in the differential diagnosis of breast diseases.With the same b value,the specificity of the lesion's ADC val-ue was higher than that of rADC value;however,there was no statistically significant difference between them.While pecto-ralis major muscle taken as a reference,its diagnostic value was equal to that of the normal breast tissue as a reference when using rADC.