Application of quantitative evaluation of computed diffusion-weighted imaging using 3-T magnetic reso-nance imaging for breast cancer
Huazhi XU,Jiejie ZHOU,Xiangzhi YUAN,Xiaohe YE,Qiong YE,Ji-ance LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2017.07.004
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To quantitatively compare the signal-to-noise (SNR) and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between series computed diffusion-weighted images (cDWI) and directly measured diffusion-weighted images (mDWI) with b value of 1000 s/mm2 in patients with breast cancer using 3.0T MRI, and to obtain opti-mized b value cDWI images with diagnostic quality. Methods: Twenty-four patients with breast cancer (female, age ranged 25-63 years) received DWI examinations at 3.0T (b values of 0, 1000 s/mm2) to create cDWI images at arbitrary b values of 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000 s/mm2 under MATLAB 2015b environ-ment. Regions of interest (ROI) were drawn on tumor-suspicious lesions and normal-appearing regions. Results:The CNR between tumor and normal regions in cDWI showed a continuously improvement with increasing b value (H=62.779, P<0.05), but the SNR was progressively decreased (H=134.985, P<0.05). cDWI1000 and mDWI1000 showed a similar CNR (t=0.096, P>0.05), but SNR of cDWI1000 was higher than that of mDWI1000 (t=2.868, P<0.05). SNR of the remaining b value cDWI were lower than mDWI1000 (t=-7.766, -11.377, -12.259,-12.737, -12.869, -12.896, all P<0.01). CNR of b value range (b=1500, 2000, 2500, 3000 s/mm2) cDWI were higher than those of mDWI1000 (t=3.138, 3.263, 2.855, 2.243, P<0.05), but the difference of CNR between higher b value cDWI and mDWI1000 was not significant (t=2.066, 1.839, P>0.05). Conclusion: The high b-value cDWI images contributes to visualize the breast cancer, and the optimal b value cDWI for breast cancer detection is in the range of 1500-2000 s/mm2.