Abstract:Target Audience Radiologists, MR technologists and clinicians Purpose Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR imaging is a non-invasive method with the ability of separation of “pure” molecular diffusion and perfusion effects. Some previous researches have compared the healthy and cancerous tissue using IVIM method. However, chronic prostatitis mainly contributes low diagnostic specificity of prostate cancer detection in the peripheral zone(PZ), which showed similar MR appearances with prostate cancer. Therefore the purpose of this study were to assess diffusion/perfusion IVIM features in histologically confirmed chronic prostatitis, prostate cancer and normal prostate PZ and compare with conventional DWI. Methods The local ethics committee approved the study and 19 patients (mean 72±2years; range 57-84 years) with TRUS biopsy after MR examination were recruited into the study. The study was performed on a 3.0-T MRI scanner (Achieva 3.0T TX, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) with 32-channel SENSE cardiac coil. The IVIM protocol was performed with a single-shot SE EPI sequence (five b-values 0, 188, 375, 563, 750 s/mm; TR/TE 4114/75ms; FOV AP/RL/FH 160/180/66 mm; slices 22). Data were fitted with IVIM biexponential model using in-house software developed using IDL (Research Systems, Inc., USA) to obtain the diffusion coefficients (D) and perfusion fractions (f). The conventional DWI protocol included two DWI series: 0/800 and 0/1200 s/mm were also performed to obtain the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC800, ADC1200) with monoexponential model using Diffusion software package in workstation (Philips Healthcare). The regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the 114 sextant regions based on the sextant analysis, including pathologically confirmed prostate cancer (n=37), chronic prostatitis (n=36) and normal prostate PZ (n=41). The average D, f and ADC (ADC800, ADC1200) for each region were computed respectively. Results The mean D, ADC800 and ADC1200 in the prostate cancer were significantly higher than those in chronic prostatitis and normal PZ (P<0.05, AVONA analysis) (Table 1, Figure 1). The mean f in the prostate cancer and chronic prostatitis were significantly higher than normal PZ (P<0.05). However, no significant difference of f was found between prostate cancer and chronic prostatitis (Table 1, Figure 1). Discussion Chronic prostatitis demonstrated significantly higher diffusion characteristics than prostate cancer, while obviously higher perfusion and lower diffusion property than normal PZ detecting via IVIM analysis. The results of biexponential diffusion coefficient were not only comparable with that from monoexponential model and accordance with pathology results, but also showed the separation between prostate cancer and chronic prostatitis was greater for the biexponential diffusion coefficient than for the monoexponential model. Conclusion IVIM allows for non-invasive characterization of biological changes (both perfusion fraction and diffusion) in prostate gland with chronic inflammation or prostate cancer, which may be of great potential in the better detection of prostate cancer.

The Diagnostic Ability of Biexponential Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer in Peripheral Zone:Compared to Monoexponential DWI

Biexponential Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Values in the Prostate: Comparison among Normal Tissue, Prostate Cancer, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostatitis

Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging

Comparison of stretched-exponential and monoexponential models of diffusion-weighted imaging between prostate cancer and normal tissues

Discrimination of Prostate Cancer from Chronic Prostatitis : Comparison between Biexponential and Monoexponential Models

Preliminary Research for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Using Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Comparison of Stretched‐exponential and Monoexponential Model Diffusion‐weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissues

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the prostate:preliminary study

Diagnostic Efficacy of B Value (2000 S/mm2) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Prostate Cancer: Comparison of a Reduced Field of View Sequence and a Conventional Technique

Differentiation of Prostate Cancer and Stromal Hyperplasia in the Transition Zone with Monoexponential, Stretched-Exponential Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in a Reduced Number of B Values: Correlation with Whole-Mount Pathology

Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images: Differentiation Between Prostate Cancer and Normal Tissue Based on a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System.

Diagnostic criterion of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostatic peripheral zone cancer

The Application Value of B in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by DWI MRI

Diagnostic Value of 3.0T MR Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer

Value of MR diffusion weighted imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Diagnostic value of 3. 0T MR diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer

Differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the prostate by MR diffusion weighted imaging

Diagnosis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Prostatic Central Gland Cancer

Impact of different methods for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement on diagnosis of peripheral zone of prostate

DWI in differential diagnosis of low T2 signal in peripheral zone of prostatitis and prostatic carcinoma

The Effect of Different b-values on the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and DADC in Prostate Cancerous and Non-cancerous Regions