Impact of different methods for apparent diffusion coefficient measurement on diagnosis of peripheral zone of prostate

Xue-mei GUO,Xiao-ying WANG,Bing WU,Xue-xiang JIANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2008.08.025

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the differences between the two methods of ADC values measurement and to investigate the diagnostic values in the prostate cancer (PCa) in peripheral zone. Methods: DWI scans were performed to 54 patients among which 31 were non-cancerous and 23 had PCa. Two methods for measuring ADC values were employed. Method one: round region of interest (ROI) areas about 30 mm 2 were placed at peripheral zone with lowest ADC value. Method two: the whole volumes of the unilateral peripheral zones were measured using a freehand method on the ADC map. The diagnostic efficacy of ADC value in PCa was evaluated by ROC analysis. Twelve patients were selected to test the interobserver variance by Bland-Altman analysis. Results: All of 549 ROIs were obtained by two methods. The ADC values of method two were significantly higher than the ones of method one with a corelation coefficient of 0.958. The ROC areas were 0.856 and 0.850 for the two methods with no statistic difference. But the diagnostic cut point of method two is higher than method one. The interobserver reproducibility is good with method two better than method one. Conclusion: The ADC values obtained by the two methods were different but had no significant impact on the diagnosis of PCa. Method one was easier while method two has better reproducibility.