Abstract:Purpose: To determine the measurement consistency of diffusion parameters derived from DKI based on different slice protocols and ROIs in recta] cancer. Methods: Sixty patients with histologically proven rectal cancers were examined by MRI using DKI sequence. Two readers measured ADC, MK and MD values using center ROI and outline ROI The outline ROI was drawn along the border of the low intensity signal of the tumor on the ADC map to cover the entire tumor area of each slice. The center ROI was drawn using circle tool to cover the entire tumor solid parts as larger as possible. ROIs were copied to MK and MD maps automatically by the software. Tumor ADC, MK and MD values were measured according to three distinct slice protocols: [a] whole slices, [b] single-slice of largest tumor namely "single slice"and [c] "tumor parts of largest independent tumor-containing slices and two adjacent slices" namely "three slices". After 2 weeks, the measurement was repeated by the same two readers. Differences of ADC, MK and MD value among three slice protocols were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Differences of ADC, MK and MD value between center ROI and outline ROI were analyzed by paired t-test. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate the intra-and inter-observer variability. Results: There was no significant difference of ADC values among three distinct slice protocols (P ＞ 0.05),the same as MK and MD values. The ADC and MD values obtained by outline ROI were higher than that by center ROI (P ＜ 0.05), but K values by using outline ROI was lower than that by center ROI. The intra-and inter-observer correlation coefficients of ADC, MK and MD were 0.913, 0.803; 0.927,0.903; 0.931,0.860 by whole slices-center ROI, and 0.954, 0.822; 0.942, 0.931; 0.941,0.879 by whole slices-outline ROI. Conclusions: The slice protocols had little influence on diffusion parameters. These parameters were influenced by ROIs. The whole slices-center ROI protocol is simple and easy to use,but provide less reproducible and stable results than whole slices-center ROI. The whole slices-outline ROI protocol could provide more reproducible and stable results and reflect the tumor more comprehensively, but need more time than whole slices-center ROI.

Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Histological Characterization of Rectal Cancer: Impact of Different Region-of-Interest Positioning Protocols on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements.

Comparison of reduced field‐of‐view diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and conventional DWI techniques in the assessment of rectal carcinoma at 3.0T: Image quality and histological T staging

Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Rectal Cancer Invasiveness: Whole-Lesion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) Histogram Analysis by Comparison of Reduced Field-of-View and Conventional DWI Techniques

Limited role of DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in breast lesions presenting as non-mass enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Quantitative T2-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2 and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors

Diffusion Parameters of Rectal Cancer Derived from Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI): Effect of Slice Protocols and Region of Interest on Measurement Consistency of Parameters

Diffusion kurtosis imaging in the characterisation of rectal cancer: utilizing the most repeatable region-of-interest strategy for diffusion parameters on a 3T scanner

Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and pathological prognostic factors in rectal cancer

Quantitative Assessment of Breast Tumor: Comparison of Four Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for Synthetic Relaxometry and Diffusion Measurement

Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient in clinicopathologic and prognostic features of rectal cancer

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurement in Glioma: Influence of Region-Of-Interest Determination Methods on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values, Interobserver Variability, Time Efficiency, and Diagnostic Ability

Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values

Intra-voxel Incoherent Motion Parameters of Rectal Cancer at 3.0 T MRI:effect of Region of Interest on Measurement Consistency of Parameters

Diffusion Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Orbital Tumors: Diagnostic Performance of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Based on Region of Interest Selection Method

Effect of region of interest on ADC and interobserver variability in thyroid nodules

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Derived from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Differentiate Between Tumor, Tumor-Adjacent and Tumor-Distant Tissues in Resectable Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Value: A Potential Imaging Biomarker That Reflects the Biological Features of Rectal Cancer

Effects of Region of Interest Sizes on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements of Pleomorphic Adenoma, Warthin Tumor, and Normal Parotid Parenchyma.

The Clinical Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of Readout Segmentation of Long Variable Echo Trains and Correlation with Ki-67 Expression in Distal Rectal Cancer

Comparison of Computed and Acquired DWI in the Assessment of Rectal Cancer: Image Quality and Preoperative Staging.