Abstract:THE importance of the choice situation is reflected in the considerable amount of theory and research on conflict. Conflict theory has generally dealt, however, with the phenomena that lead up to the choice. What happens after the choice has received little attention. The present paper is concerned with some of the consequences of making a choice. Previous consideration of the consequences of choice have been limited to relatively unspecified hypotheses (1, 3) or to qualitative analysis (4). However, a recent theory by Festinger (2) makes possible several explicit predictions. According to this analysis of the choice situation, all cognitive elements (items of information) that favor the chosen alternative are "consonant," and all cognitive elements that favor the unchosen alternative are "dissonant" with the choice behavior. Furthermore, other things being equal, the greater the number of elements favoring the unchosen alternative (i.e., the greater the relative attractiveness of the unchosen alternative) the greater the resulting "dissonance." When "dissonance" exists, the person will attempt to eliminate or reduce it. Although space limitations preclude further discussion of the theory, it may be said that several derivations are possible concerning the consequences of making a choice. The present study was designed to test the following: 1. Choosing between two alternatives creates dissonance and a consequent pressure to reduce it. The dissonance is reduced by making the chosen alternative more desirable and the unchosen alternative less desirable after the choice than they were before it. 2. The magnitude of the dissonance and the 1 This paper is based on a thesis offered in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at the University of Minnesota. The author wishes to thank his advisor, Dr. Leon Festinger, for his invaluable aid in the formulation and execution of the study. He also wishes to thank the Laboratory for Research in Social Relations, which supported the study. 4 The author is now in the Department of Psychology, Yale University. consequent pressure to reduce it are greater the more closely the alternatives approach equal desirability. 3. Exposing a person to new relevant cognitive elements, at least some of which are consonant, facilitates the reduction of dissonance.

"Every Coin Has Two Sides": the Effects of Dialectical Thinking and Attitudinal Ambivalence on Psychological Discomfort and Consumer Choice

The Moderating Role of Dialecticism in Consumer Responses to Product Information

Collaboration between East and West: influence of consumer dialectical self on attitude towards co-brand personality traits

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

The Yin and Yang of Attitudes and Related Constructs

Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction.

Control Deprivation and Styles of Thinking

Asserting Your Mind: Interruptions Extremize Consumer Choices

Cultural Differences in Expectations of Change and Tolerance for Contradiction: A Decade of Empirical Research

Dialectical mind can be sweet toward crisis-associated products/brands

Cultural Differences in Mixed Emotions: The Role of Dialectical Thinking

Dialectical Self-Esteem and East-West Differences in Psychological Well-Being.

What Is Dialectical Thinking? Conceptualization and Measurement

Perceiving multiple truths: Does dialectical thinking harmonize colourblind and multicultural ideals?

Culturally based lay beliefs as a tool for understanding intergroup and intercultural relations

The Moderate Effect of Cognitive Needs on the Options,Time and Decision Aversion for Consumers

The Dialectical Self-Concept: Contradiction, Change, and Holism in East Asian Cultures.

Dialecticism and the Co-occurrence of Positive and Negative Emotions Across Cultures

Dialectical Versus Linear Thinking Shapes People's Anticipation of Climate Change

Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives.

Dialectical Versus Linear Thinking Shapes People’s Anticipation of Climate Change