Abstract:BACKGROUND: The notion that neutral alignment is mandatory to assure long-term durability after TKA has been based mostly on short-film studies. However, this is challenged by recent long-film studies.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We conducted this long-film study to know (1) whether the risk of aseptic revision for nontraumatic reasons was greater among knees with greater than 3° varus or valgus (defined as "outliers") than those that were aligned within 3° of neutral on long-standing mechanical axis (hip to knee) radiographs; and (2) what the failure mechanisms were and whether the malalignment was femoral or tibial in origin, or both, among those in the outlier group.METHODS: Between November 1998 and January 2009 we performed 1299 cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-substituting TKAs in 867 patients for primary osteoarthritis. We had inadequate long-standing radiographs to analyze postoperative alignment for 124 of those knees, and an additional 24 were excluded for prespecified reasons. Consequently, 1151 knees were enrolled in our study. Of these, 982 (85%) in 661 patients (620 women and 41 men) who had followup greater than 24 months were analyzed. The knees were divided according to whether the postoperative mechanical axis was neutral (0° ± 3°), varus (> 3°), or valgus (< -3°) alignment on long-standing radiographs. The survivorships free from aseptic revision for nontraumatic reasons were compared among groups. The mechanical femoral and the tibial component alignment (MFCA and MTCA, respectively) were investigated to know the origin of overall mechanical malalignment of the outlier knees. The mean duration of followup was 8 ± 4 years (range, 2-17 years). Thirty-five knees (4%) showed aseptic loosening at 7 ± 4 years (range, 0.1-14 years) and five (1%) showed polyethylene wear at 12 ± 1 years (range, 10-13 years). Tibial loosening (73%) was the most common reason for aseptic revision followed by femoral loosening (30%). Of this cohort, 687 (70%), 250 (25%), and 45 (5%) knees had overall mechanical neutral, varus, and valgus alignment, respectively. Factors associated with the risk of aseptic revision were identified by Cox regression.RESULTS: The varus outliers (but not the valgus outliers) failed more often than the neutral knees (10% [25 of 250] versus 2% [13 of 687]; odds ratio [OR], 5.8, 95% CI, 2.9-11.5; p < 0.001). Ten-year survivorship free from aseptic revision was lower among varus outliers than among knees with neutral alignment (87% [95% CI, 80%-93%] versus 98% [95% CI, 97%-99%]; p = 0.001). Femoral component varus malpositioning was the main origin of the varus outliers (MFCA = 4.2° ± 2.0°; MTCA = 0.9° ± 1.7°) and was a risk factor for aseptic revision compared with neutral femoral positioning (OR, 14.0; 95% CI, 1.9-105.6; p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: This long-film study corresponds to previous short-film studies for the notion that varus malalignment is associated with inferior long-term implant survivorship. Although aseptic loosening occurred most commonly on the tibial side, the primary origin of the overall varus malalignment was femoral component varus malpositioning. Aiming for neutral alignment in TKA still seems to be a reasonable strategy in clinical practice.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Shorter Survival Rate in Varus-Aligned Knees after Total Knee Arthroplasty

Effects of preoperative valgus deformity in patients undergoing neutrally aligned total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up

Correlation Between Preoperative and Postoperative Alignment and Kinematic Gait in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Effect of Postoperative Mechanical Axis Alignment on Survival and Functional Outcomes of Modern Total Knee Arthroplasties with Cement: A Concise Follow-up at 20 Years*

Residual Varus Alignment after Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Limits Medial Soft Tissue Remodeling

Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Avoid Crossing Over From Varus to Valgus

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ranawat II Valgus Deformity with Enlarged Femoral Valgus Cut Angle: A New Technique to Achieve Balanced Gap.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Adjusted Restricted Kinematic Alignment for the Treatment of Severe Varus Deformity: Technical Note

Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA

Effect of joint‐line obliquity on long‐term survivorship of total knee arthroplasty: A postoperative phenotype analysis

Malalignment and Malposition of Quadriceps-Sparing Approach in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Do Minimally Invasive Approaches Affect Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Cohort Analysis with a Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

Comparison of Outcomes in Obese Patients after Total Knee Arthroplasty with Neutral or Mild Varus: A Retrospective Study with 8‐Year Follow‐Up

Quadriceps-sparing Versus Traditional Medial Parapatellar Approaches for Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Meta-Analysis

Alignment in TKA: what has been clear is not anymore!

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

[Influence of correction degree on the clinical effect of valgus knee after total knee arthroplasty]

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a five-year prospective, multicentre, survivorship study

Modified kinematic alignment better restores plantar pressure distribution than mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

Effect of Femoral Resection on Coronal Overall Alignment after Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

Factors predicting lower limb alignment after Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty