Abstract:BACKGROUND: The notion that neutral alignment is mandatory to assure long-term durability after TKA has been based mostly on short-film studies. However, this is challenged by recent long-film studies.QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We conducted this long-film study to know (1) whether the risk of aseptic revision for nontraumatic reasons was greater among knees with greater than 3° varus or valgus (defined as "outliers") than those that were aligned within 3° of neutral on long-standing mechanical axis (hip to knee) radiographs; and (2) what the failure mechanisms were and whether the malalignment was femoral or tibial in origin, or both, among those in the outlier group.METHODS: Between November 1998 and January 2009 we performed 1299 cemented, posterior cruciate ligament-substituting TKAs in 867 patients for primary osteoarthritis. We had inadequate long-standing radiographs to analyze postoperative alignment for 124 of those knees, and an additional 24 were excluded for prespecified reasons. Consequently, 1151 knees were enrolled in our study. Of these, 982 (85%) in 661 patients (620 women and 41 men) who had followup greater than 24 months were analyzed. The knees were divided according to whether the postoperative mechanical axis was neutral (0° ± 3°), varus (> 3°), or valgus (< -3°) alignment on long-standing radiographs. The survivorships free from aseptic revision for nontraumatic reasons were compared among groups. The mechanical femoral and the tibial component alignment (MFCA and MTCA, respectively) were investigated to know the origin of overall mechanical malalignment of the outlier knees. The mean duration of followup was 8 ± 4 years (range, 2-17 years). Thirty-five knees (4%) showed aseptic loosening at 7 ± 4 years (range, 0.1-14 years) and five (1%) showed polyethylene wear at 12 ± 1 years (range, 10-13 years). Tibial loosening (73%) was the most common reason for aseptic revision followed by femoral loosening (30%). Of this cohort, 687 (70%), 250 (25%), and 45 (5%) knees had overall mechanical neutral, varus, and valgus alignment, respectively. Factors associated with the risk of aseptic revision were identified by Cox regression.RESULTS: The varus outliers (but not the valgus outliers) failed more often than the neutral knees (10% [25 of 250] versus 2% [13 of 687]; odds ratio [OR], 5.8, 95% CI, 2.9-11.5; p < 0.001). Ten-year survivorship free from aseptic revision was lower among varus outliers than among knees with neutral alignment (87% [95% CI, 80%-93%] versus 98% [95% CI, 97%-99%]; p = 0.001). Femoral component varus malpositioning was the main origin of the varus outliers (MFCA = 4.2° ± 2.0°; MTCA = 0.9° ± 1.7°) and was a risk factor for aseptic revision compared with neutral femoral positioning (OR, 14.0; 95% CI, 1.9-105.6; p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: This long-film study corresponds to previous short-film studies for the notion that varus malalignment is associated with inferior long-term implant survivorship. Although aseptic loosening occurred most commonly on the tibial side, the primary origin of the overall varus malalignment was femoral component varus malpositioning. Aiming for neutral alignment in TKA still seems to be a reasonable strategy in clinical practice.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Effects of preoperative valgus deformity in patients undergoing neutrally aligned total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up

[Influence of correction degree on the clinical effect of valgus knee after total knee arthroplasty]

Residual Mild Varus Alignment and Neutral Mechanical Alignment Have Similar Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty for Varus Osteoarthritis in Five-Year Follow-Up

[[INFLUENCES OF PREOPERATIVE SEVERE LOWER LIMB DEFORMITY ON PROSTHESIS INSTALLATION AND ALIGNMENT RESTORATION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY].

Mid-term Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Low-restricted Posterior-stabilized Prosthesis in Patients with Severe Fixed Valgus Deformity: A Case-Control Study

Comparison of Outcomes after Total Knee Arthroplasty Involving Postoperative Neutral or Residual Mild Varus Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Avoid Crossing Over From Varus to Valgus

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Ranawat II Valgus Deformity with Enlarged Femoral Valgus Cut Angle: A New Technique to Achieve Balanced Gap.

Slight Femoral Under-Correction Versus Neutral Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Preoperative Varus Knees: a Comparative Study

Clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty for valgus knee*

Correlation Between Preoperative and Postoperative Alignment and Kinematic Gait in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The Effect of Severe Varus Deformity on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Mechanical Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Medial Stabilizing Technique

Residual Varus Alignment after Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Limits Medial Soft Tissue Remodeling

Effect of Individual Distal Femoral Valgus Resection in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients with Valgus Knee: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Effect of Knee Valgus Deformity on Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism and Prosthesis Revision Risk after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Comparison of Outcomes in Obese Patients after Total Knee Arthroplasty with Neutral or Mild Varus: A Retrospective Study with 8‐Year Follow‐Up

Shorter Survival Rate in Varus-Aligned Knees after Total Knee Arthroplasty

[Clinical effect of total knee arthroplasty on patients with knee osteoarthritis combined with mild to moderate valgus knee deformity]

Medially congruent total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee deformities yields satisfactory outcomes: a multicenter, international study

Comparison of the Efficacy of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Different Prostheses for Knee Valgus

Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA