Do Minimally Invasive Approaches Affect Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Cohort Analysis with a Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

Fu‐Zhen Yuan,Zewen Sun,Jun Fu,Yonggang Meng,Jiying Zhang,Yourong Chen,Jia-Kuo Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000002125
2023-01-01
Abstract:To the Editor: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a safe and effective treatment for patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis, with the conventional medial parapatellar (MP) approach for TKA, good visualization of the knee can be obtained, helping to achieve correct osteotomy, proper ligament balance and good prosthesis position, which are all important for good long-term results. To improve functional recovery and rehabilitation, some studies have adopted a relatively small incision operation to improve operation. Among them, two of the most commonly used procedures are named mini-medial parapatellar (MMP) and quadriceps-sparing (QS) approaches. But other studies suggested that minimally invasive approaches may compromise the advantages of correct osteotomy, proper ligament balance, and good prosthesis position to achieve potentially rapid rehabilitation, potentially sacrificing the long-term clinical outcomes and survival of the prostheses. At present, most of the studies compared different approaches that evaluated the follow-up of no more than 5 years. Thus, it is crucial to obtain the data of long-term clinical comparison. Based on the longitudinal cohort results of previous studies, a follow-up study for more than 10 years was conducted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?