Abstract:LNMO/LTO cells represent an excellent vehicle with which to test the impact of electrolyte additives on cell performance due to the high potential of LNMO which leads to electrolyte oxidation. Additives that prevent this oxidation are desired. Electrolyte additive researchers normally compare the capacity retention versus cycle number of cells with and without additives. If the capacity retention is improved, the additive is "good". In this paper, this logic is shown to be flawed. One additive, LiO-t-C4F9, which does improve capacity retention versus cycle number, is shown to do so by increasing electrolyte oxidation at the positive electrode. This causes increased charge end point capacity slippage and increased self discharge rates. As such, these additives, like many promoted in the literature, are not "good", but are "bad". On the other hand, one additive, Al(HFiP)(3), is shown to reduce parasitic reactions at the LNMO electrode but does not lead to improved capacity retention. A full understanding of the impact of the additive on the parasitic reaction rates at both positive and negative electrodes is required before a sound judgment about the impact of an additive can be made. Therefore, additive researchers must pay attention to coulombic efficiency, capacity end point slippage, reversible and irreversible capacity loss during storage as well as voltage drop during storage in addition to the long-time cycling performance for cells to get an overall evaluation of electrolyte additives. (C) 2013 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Influences on Power Performances of Metal Oxide Additives for LiFePO4 Electrodes

Nanostructure Optimization of LiFePO4/carbon Aerogel Composites for Performance Enhancement

Synthesis and Characterization of LiFePO4 Nanoparticle/Mesoporous Carbon Composites As High-Power Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Electrolyte Additive Combinations That Enhance Performance of High-Capacity Li1.2Ni0.15Mn0.55Co0.1O2–graphite Cells

A Consideration of Electrolyte Additives for Lini0.5mn1.5o4/Li4ti5o12 Li-Ion Cells

Research of Lifepo4/Acetylene Electrochemical Performance by Doping Moo3

The Effect of Crystal Face of Fe2O3 on the Electrochemical Performance for Lithium-ion Batteries

Probing the Effectiveness in Stabilizing Lithium Metal Anodes through Functional Additives

Doping Effects on Electronic Conductivity and Electrochemical Performance of Lifepo4

Influence of Lanthanum Doping on Performance of LiFePO4 Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Structure and Electrochemical Performance of LiFePO4/C Cathode Materials Coated with Nano Al2O3 for Lithium-ion Battery

Effect of Heteroatom Doping on Electrochemical Properties of Olivine LiFePO4 Cathodes for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries

A Balancing Act: Experimental Insights into the Volume Fraction of Conductive Additive in Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes

Enhanced prelithiation performance of Li 5 FeO 4 cathode additive and optimized solid electrolyte interface enabled by Mn substitution

Effects of oxidized Ketjen Black as conductive additives on electrochemical performance of the LiMn2O4@Al2O3 cathode in lithium-ion batteries

Effect of metal-sulfide additives on electrochemical properties of nano-sized Fe2O3-loaded carbon for Fe/air battery anodes

New insight into the mechanism of LiPO2F2 on the interface of high-voltage cathode LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 with truncated octahedral structure

Effect of F-doping on the properties of LiFePO4-x/3Fx/C cathode materials via wet mechanical agitation-assisted high-temperature ball milling method

Exploring synergetic effects of vinylene carbonate and 1,3-propane sultone on LiNi0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2/graphite cells with excellent high-temperature performance

Effects of Nanoscale Conductive Additives on High Temperature and High Power Performance of Nickel Electrodes

Performance of LiFePO4 as lithium battery cathode and comparison with manganese and vanadium oxides