Abstract:Abstract. Mobility particle size spectrometers often referred to as DMPS (Differential Mobility Particle Sizers) or SMPS (Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers) have found a wide range of applications in atmospheric aerosol research. However, comparability of measurements conducted world-wide is hampered by lack of generally accepted technical standards and guidelines with respect to the instrumental set-up, measurement mode, data evaluation as well as quality control. Technical standards were developed for a minimum requirement of mobility size spectrometry to perform long-term atmospheric aerosol measurements. Technical recommendations include continuous monitoring of flow rates, temperature, pressure, and relative humidity for the sheath and sample air in the differential mobility analyzer. We compared commercial and custom-made inversion routines to calculate the particle number size distributions from the measured electrical mobility distribution. All inversion routines are comparable within few per cent uncertainty for a given set of raw data. Furthermore, this work summarizes the results from several instrument intercomparison workshops conducted within the European infrastructure project EUSAAR (European Supersites for Atmospheric Aerosol Research) and ACTRIS (Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases Research InfraStructure Network) to determine present uncertainties especially of custom-built mobility particle size spectrometers. Under controlled laboratory conditions, the particle number size distributions from 20 to 200 nm determined by mobility particle size spectrometers of different design are within an uncertainty range of around ±10% after correcting internal particle losses, while below and above this size range the discrepancies increased. For particles larger than 200 nm, the uncertainty range increased to 30%, which could not be explained. The network reference mobility spectrometers with identical design agreed within ±4% in the peak particle number concentration when all settings were done carefully. The consistency of these reference instruments to the total particle number concentration was demonstrated to be less than 5%. Additionally, a new data structure for particle number size distributions was introduced to store and disseminate the data at EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Program). This structure contains three levels: raw data, processed data, and final particle size distributions. Importantly, we recommend reporting raw measurements including all relevant instrument parameters as well as a complete documentation on all data transformation and correction steps. These technical and data structure standards aim to enhance the quality of long-term size distribution measurements, their comparability between different networks and sites, and their transparency and traceability back to raw data.

Size Characterization of Airborne SiO 2 Nanoparticles with On-Line and Off-Line Measurement Techniques: an Interlaboratory Comparison Study

Size and Time-Resolved Growth Rate Measurements of 1 to 5 Nm Freshly Formed Atmospheric Nuclei

An intercomparison study of four different techniques for measuring the chemical composition of nanoparticles

Size-Resolved Single-Particle Fluorescence Spectrometer for Real-Time Analysis of Bioaerosols: Laboratory Evaluation and Atmospheric Measurements

Comparing novel small-angle X-ray scattering approaches for absolute size and number concentration measurements of spherical SiO2 particles to established methods

Mobility Particle Size Spectrometers: Harmonization of Technical Standards and Data Structure to Facilitate High Quality Long-Term Observations of Atmospheric Particle Number Size Distributions

Overview of measurements and current instrumentation for 1–10 nm aerosol particle number size distributions

Metrological Protocols for Reaching Reliable and SI-Traceable Size Results for Multi-Modal and Complexly Shaped Reference Nanoparticles

Measurement of 100 nm monodisperse particles by four Accurate methods: Traceability and uncertainty

Nanoparticle Characterization - Supplementary Comparison on Nanoparticle Size

Measurement report: The Fifth International Workshop on Ice Nucleation phase 1 (FIN-01): intercomparison of single-particle mass spectrometers

Sizing response of the Ultra-High Sensitivity Aerosol Spectrometer (UHSAS) and Laser Aerosol Spectrometer (LAS) to changes in submicron aerosol composition and refractive index

Comparison of aerosol spectrometers : Accounting for evaporation and sampling losses

Sizing of Neutral Sub 3 Nm Tungsten Oxide Clusters Using Airmodus Particle Size Magnifier

Nanoparticle Size Distribution Quantification: Results of a SAXS Inter-Laboratory Comparison

Real-time characterization of chemical threat agent aerosols for improvement of inhalation studies

LOAC: a small aerosol optical counter/sizer for ground-based and balloon measurements of the size distribution and nature of atmospheric particles – Part 1: Principle of measurements and instrument evaluation

Study of On-line Chemical Analysis of Aerosol Individual Particles with ICP-MS

Comparison of Four Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers at the Fresno Supersite

Characterization of Urban Aerosols Using SEM-microscopy, X-ray Analysis and Lidar Measurements

Uncertainty Budget in the Measurement of Typical Airborne Number, Surface Area and Mass Particle Distributions