Abstract:Purpose – In 2001, the China Securities Regulatory Commission required that at least one-third of the members of corporate boards of directors come from outside the organization. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of this change of regulation on corporate governance in China. In particular, the authors examine whether the increase in the proportion of outsider directors can increase the monitoring quality of the board. Design/methodology/approach – The basic empirical methodology is a logit regression in which the dependent variable is a binary variable that represents one of the three “negative events” identified as the indicators of poor monitoring quality. The independent variables are firm-level control variables. Findings – Using Chinese stock data from 1999 to 2005, the authors find that the resulting increase in board independence has reduced the occurrence of connected transactions and violations such as financial statement fraud, illegal insider trading, and asset misappropriation. However, this positive effect of board independence is not uniform across firms. The authors show that a higher degree of fundamental uncertainty in a firm impedes the effectiveness of board independence. The authors also document that the level of board independence is positively associated with firm performance, as measured either in stock market return or accounting return. Originality/value – In this paper, the authors aim to investigate the effectiveness of outsider directors in a more direct way than has previous research. The authors measure the improvement in the quality of board monitoring by the reduction of the likelihood of those corporate events that could reduce firms’ value. In particular, the authors examine the relationship between the board independence and the occurrence of “negative” corporate events in China. To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study that explores the link between board independence and the probabilities of these events.

Removing Vacant Chairs: Does Independent Directors’ Attendance at Board Meetings Matter?

External Regulation, Independent Director Attendance, and Governance Effects

Study on Non-regulatory Determinants of Independent Directors——Empirical Evidence from China's Listed Firms Based on Panel Data

Structural Hole Position of Independent Director N etworks and Corporate Risk-ta king

Board Independence and the Quality of Board Monitoring: Evidence from China

Can Independent Directors Deter the Tunneling of Large Shareholders?

How does independent director affect tunneling?-Evidence from social networks

From Classroom to Boardroom: the Value of Academic Independent Directors

State - owned Enterprises Restructuring,Board Independence,and Investment Efficiency

The Independence of Independent Directors:Evidence from Board Voting Behavior

The Impact of Major Stake-holding,Independent Directors on Company Performance:An Endogenous Perspective

Does Independence of the Board Affect Firm Performance?

Does Independent Director really Influence on Internal Governance Mechanism

Do Politically Connected Independent Directors Matter? Evidence from Mandatory Resignation Events in China

Ownership Nature,Independent Director Mechanism and Investment Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China′s Non-financial A-share Listed Companies

Industry Expertise of Independent Directors and Board Monitoring

Naive independent directors, corporate governance and firm performance

Does Board Monitoring Substitute for External Corporate Governance? Evidence from Private Firms

Remote Board Meetings and Board Monitoring Effectiveness: Evidence from China

Independent Director, Earnings Conservatism, Investments Opportunity-Empirical Evidence From Chinese Listed Companies

Change of the Independent Director's Governing Efficiency under the Influence of Institutional Investor:Empirical Evidence from China's Listed Firms