Abstract:We examine whether large shareholders (other than the largest shareholder) could constrain the influence of the largest shareholder by electing more independent directors to the board. Moreover, we assess whether this constraining ability is related to the size of other large shareholders' ownership position relative to the largest shareholder. Using a sample of 13,951 firm-year observations from the unique Chinese capital market between 2004 and 2014, our empirical results indicate that other large shareholders can elect a larger number of independent directors to the board when their share ownership increases. However, these other large shareholders have increased voting power on the board (through a larger percentage of independent directors) only if the largest shareholder owns less than 30% of the company's shares. When the largest shareholder owns less than 30% of the shares, we find that other shareholder constraints are associated with a larger number of independent directors, a larger percentage of independent directors on the board and a larger board size. In addition, board size partially mediates the relationship between other shareholder constraints and the percentage of independent directors. For companies in which the largest shareholder owns at least 30% of the shares, our results indicate that other shareholder constraints are associated with a higher number of independent directors and larger boards, but are not associated with the percentage of independent directors. Moreover, the increased board size fully mediates the relationship between other shareholder constrains and the percentage of independent directors. A larger number of independent directors, without an increase in the percentage of independent directors, suggests that the relationship between other shareholder constraints and the percentage of independent directors is mainly driven by the other shareholder constraints/board size relationship, rather than by an increased percentage of independent directors. Our results indicate that minority shareholders may have a voice on the board, but greater board voting power is more difficult for the minority shareholder to obtain.

Can Independent Directors Deter the Tunneling of Large Shareholders?

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

How does independent director affect tunneling?-Evidence from social networks

Bank Financing and Corporate Governance

Can Equity Incentive Deter the Tunneling of Large Shareholders?

Does Minority Ownership Concentration Influence the Relationship between Board Independence and Tunneling?

Large Shareholder Tunneling and Risk of Stock Price Crash: Evidence from China

Large Shareholder Tunneling and the Monitoring Role of Auditor

Tunneling Through Allies: Affiliated Shareholders, Insider Trading, and Monitoring Failure

Earnings Management to Tunnel: Evidence from China's Listed Companies

Control of Single Large Shareholder and Board Structure Model

The Study of Tunneling in Chinas Listed Companies——Evidence from the Non-Tradable Shares Transfer and Restricted Shares Transfer

Tunneling through Non-Operational Fund Occupancy: An investigation based on officially identified activities

Tunneling in China: the Surprisingly Pervasive Use of Corporate Loans to Extract Funds from Chinese Listed Companies

Board Independence and Board Size: an Examination of Other Shareholder Constraints

Collateral damage: Evidence from share pledging in China

Shareholders' Balance Mechanisms and Tunneling from Controlling Shareholder's Related Party Transactions——Empirical Analysis Based on the Endogeneity of Corporate Ownership Structure

Tunneling in China: The Remarkable Case of Inter-Corporate Loans

What Determines the Severity of Tunneling in China?

Tunneling through Employee Stock Ownership Plans: Evidence from China