Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine whether a firm's demand for high-quality auditors is influenced by multiple large shareholders (MLS). As one type of ownership structure, MLS have gained popularity in China recently and have different types of large shareholders, including large institutional shareholder, large foreign shareholder and large state shareholder. The authors also examine whether different types of MLS have heterogeneous impacts on appointing high-quality auditors. Design/methodology/approach With a sample of 27,131 firm-year observations from Chinese public companies from 2003 to 2018, the authors use multivariate regressions to examine the effect of MLS on auditor choice. Heckman two-stage analysis, a firm fixed effects model, propensity score matching and difference-in-differences test are used as robustness checks. Findings This paper finds that the presence and power of MLS increase the likelihood of appointing high-quality auditors. With regard to the types of MLS, large institutional shareholders and foreign shareholders have significant positive effects on appointing high-quality auditors, while the presence of state-owned large shareholders has no effect on auditor choice. Further analyses reveal that the positive effect of MLS on high-quality auditor choice is more pronounced in firms with severe agency problems and information asymmetry. Taken together, these results suggest that MLS play a monitoring role by demanding high-quality auditors. Originality/value This paper contributes to the literature on the determinants of auditor choice. While prior studies primarily focus on the impact of concentrated ownership structure, corporate governance and the pressure from stakeholders on auditor choice, this paper complements the literature by providing evidence from the heterogeneous effects of different types MLS. This paper also extends the literature on the consequences of MLS from the perspective of auditor choice.

Large Shareholder Tunneling and the Monitoring Role of Auditor

Public Governance and Tunneling: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in China

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Bank Financing and Corporate Governance

Controlling Shareholder′s Embezzlement of Listed Company′s Funds and Earning Management

Monitoring or Colluding: the Role of Venture Capital Investors in the IPO Process

Tunneling in China: the Surprisingly Pervasive Use of Corporate Loans to Extract Funds from Chinese Listed Companies

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Tunneling Through Allies: Affiliated Shareholders, Insider Trading, and Monitoring Failure

Tunneling in China: The Remarkable Case of Inter-Corporate Loans

Earnings Management to Tunnel: Evidence from China's Listed Companies

Can Independent Directors Deter the Tunneling of Large Shareholders?

Collateral damage: Evidence from share pledging in China

Tunneling Through Intercorporate Loans: the China Experience☆

Large Shareholder Tunneling and Risk of Stock Price Crash: Evidence from China

Tunneling through Non-Operational Fund Occupancy: An investigation based on officially identified activities

Does Controlling Shareholders’ Financial Risk Affect Auditors’ Perceptions of Firms’ Financial Reporting Risk? Evidence from Share Pledging

Nature of Control Shareholder,Tunneling and Magnitude of Earnings Management

Can Equity Incentive Deter the Tunneling of Large Shareholders?

Tunneling through Employee Stock Ownership Plans: Evidence from China

Multiple large shareholders and auditor choice: evidence from China