Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

Does Board Monitoring Substitute for External Corporate Governance? Evidence from Private Firms

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Do Venture Capitalists Play A Monitoring Role in an Emerging Market? Evidence from the Pay-Performance Relationship of Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms

How Board Faultlines Affect Board Effectiveness in Monitoring

How Boards’ Factional Faultlines Affect Corporate Financial Fraud

The Independence of Independent Directors:Evidence from Board Voting Behavior

Advisory directors, monitoring directors and board governance effectiveness

Board Structure, Political Influence and Firm Performance - an Empirical Study on Publicly Listed Firms in China

Empirical Research on Efficiency of Outside Director's System of Chineses Listed Companies

A Separate Monitoring Organ And Disclosure Of Firm-Specific Information

Can the Chinese Two-Tier-Board System Control the Board Chair Pay?

Cross-owners as monitors: more supervisory or distracted? Evidence from China

Corporate takeovers, firm performance, and board composition

Are CEOs in Public U.S. Firms Overpaid? New Evidence from Private Firms

Study on Non-regulatory Determinants of Independent Directors——Empirical Evidence from China's Listed Firms Based on Panel Data

Empirical Study on the Monitoring Performance of Listed Company's Independent Director System in China

Government Regulation, Corporate Board, and Firm Value: Evidence from China

An Empirical Analysis on the Structure of Board of Director and the Performance Evaluation of Listed Companies of Electronic Information Industry in China

Heterogeneous Firm Responses to Regulations Regarding Board Independence: Evidence from China

Removing Vacant Chairs: Does Independent Directors’ Attendance at Board Meetings Matter?

Executive Board Chairs: Examining the Performance Consequences of a Corporate Governance Hybrid