Abstract:Objective: To explore the predictive value of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and modified early warning score (MEWS) in evaluating the prognosis of patients in intensive care unit (ICU) of secondary hospitals, and to provide guidance for clinical application. Methods: The clinical data of adult critical patients admitted to the ICU of Wanzhou District First People's Hospital from October 2022 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the clinical outcome of ICU, the patients were divided into improvement group and death group. The general information, blood routine, heart, liver and kidney function indicators, coagulation indicators, blood gas analysis, APACHE II score, SOFA score, qSOFA score, MEWS score at the time of admission to the ICU, the number of cases of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and continuous blood purification (CBP) were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis was performed, and multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related factors of death. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to analyze the predictive value of the four scores in ICU patients. Results: A total of 126 patients were included, of which 45 patients died in the ICU and 81 patients improved and transferred out. Univariate analysis of death-related critically ill patients showed that procalcitonin (PCT), serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin (ALB), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial prothrombin time (APTT), D-dimer, pH value, HCO3-, blood lactic acid (Lac), number of patients treated with IMV and CBP, APACHE II score, SOFA score, qSOFA score and MEWS score were significantly different between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the APACHE II score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.115, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.025-1.213, P = 0.011], SOFA score (OR = 1.204, 95%CI was 1.037-1.398, P = 0.015), MEWS score (OR = 1.464, 95%CI was 1.102-1.946, P = 0.009), and APTT (OR = 1.081, 95%CI was 1.015-1.152, P = 0.016) were independent risk factors affecting the mortality of critically ill patients in the ICU. ROC curve analysis showed that APACHE II, SOFA, qSOFA, and MEWS scores could predict the prognosis of critically ill ICU patients, among which SOFA score had the strongest predictive effect, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.808. There was a statistically significant difference in the time required for the four scores (F = 117.333, P < 0.001), among which the MEWS scoring required the shortest time [(1.03±0.39) minutes], and the APACHE II scoring required the longest time [(2.81±1.04) minutes]. Conclusions: APACHE II, SOFA, qSOFA, and MEWS scores can be used to assess the severity of critically ill patients and predict in-hospital mortality. The SOFA score is superior to other scores in predicting severity. The MEWS is preferred because its assessment time is shortest. Early warning score can help secondary hospitals to detect potentially critical patients early and provide help for clinical rapid urgent emergency decision-making.

[Efficiency of APACHE II and III Scoring System in the Prognostication of Patients Older Than 75 Years].

A comparison between poisoning severity score (PSS) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE-Ⅱ) in poisoning evaluation

Comparison of Prognostic Value of Two Kinds of Severity Scoring Systems for Hospital Mortality Prediction of Elderly Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.

The Predictive Values of Different Scoring Systems for Mortality of Older Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Who Underwent Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Comparison Between Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ and Ⅳ in Mortality Risk Prediction of 192 Servere Acute Pancreatitis Patients

APACHE III Outcome Prediction in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with Sepsis Associated Acute Lung Injury.

[Illness Severity and Prognosis Assessment with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II for Patients after Cardiovascular Surgery].

Analysis of Effects of APACHE III Score and the Oxygenation Index on the Prognosis of the Severe Pneumonia of the Elderly Patients

[Blood Lactic Acid Level and APACHE II Score on Prognosis of Critically Ill Elderly Patients].

Evaluating Prognostic Bias of Critical Illness Severity Scores Based on Age, Sex, and Primary Language in the United States: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

[Value of Serum Procalcitonin and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score on Predicting the Prognosis of Sepsis in Elderly Patients].

The Evaluation of the Prognosis of APACHE II and ATN -ISI for Acute Kidney Injury in ICU

Evaluation of Nosocomial Infection Risk Using APACHE II Scores in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit

Performance of Three Prognostic Models in Patients with Cancer in Need of Intensive Care in a Medical Center in China.

A comparison of APACHE II and CPIS scores for the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.

[Comparison of four early warning scores in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients in secondary hospitals]

The value of APACHE II in predicting mortality after paraquat poisoning in Chinese and Korean population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Analysis of effects of APACHE Ⅲ score and the oxygenation index on the prognosis of the severe pneumonia of the elderly patients

The analysis of two scoring methods for acute stroke patients ICU mortality prediction

Application of APACHEⅡ,SAPSⅡ and SOFA Evaluating Progresis for in Evaluating Progresis for Septic Shock Patients

Comparison of the Predictive Value of Scoring Systems on the Prognosis of Cirrhotic Patients with Suspected Infection