Abstract:Objective: To observe the expression level of cytokines in patients with sepsis and its effect on prognosis. Methods: The clinical data of sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively, including gender, age, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), blood routine, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cytokines levels [interleukins (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ)] within 24 hours of admission to ICU. The 28-day prognosis of the patients was followed up. The patients were divided into survival group and death group according to the prognosis. The clinical data between the two groups of sepsis patients with different prognosis were compared. Binary Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with sepsis, and the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to evaluate the predictive value of each risk factor for the prognosis of patients with sepsis. Results: (1) A total of 227 patients with sepsis were enrolled, including 168 patients in the survival group (survival rate 74.0%) and 59 patients in the death group (mortality 26.0%). There were no significant differences in age (years old: 55.97±2.13 vs. 54.67±1.11) and gender (male: 71.2% vs. 57.1%) between the death group and the survival group (both P > 0.05), indicating that the baseline data of the two groups were comparable. (2) The APACHE II (19.37±0.99 vs. 14.88±0.61, P < 0.001) and PCT (μg/L: 12.39±2.94 vs. 4.14±0.90, P < 0.001) in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group, while the platelet count [PLT (×109/L): 144.75±12.50 vs. 215.99±11.26, P = 0.001] and thrombocytocrit [(0.14±0.01)% vs. (0.19±0.01)%, P = 0.001] were significantly lower than those in the survival group. (3) The level of IL-6 in the death group was significantly higher than that in the survival group (ng/L: 577.66±143.16 vs. 99.74±33.84, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in other cytokines, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-17 between the death group and the survival group [IL-2 (ng/L): 2.44±0.38 vs. 2.63±0.27, P = 0.708; IL-4 (ng/L): 3.26±0.67 vs. 3.18±0.34, P = 0.913; IL-10 (ng/L): 33.22±5.13 vs. 39.43±2.85, P = 0.262; TNF-α (ng/L): 59.33±19.21 vs. 48.79±29.87, P = 0.839; IFN-γ (ng/L): 6.69±5.18 vs. 1.81±0.16, P = 0.100; IL-17 (ng/L): 2.05±0.29 vs. 2.58±0.33, P = 0.369]. (4) Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that APACHE II and IL-6 were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients with sepsis [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were 1.050 (1.008-1.093) and 1.001 (1.000-1.002), P values were 0.019 and 0.026, respectively]. (5) ROC curve analysis showed that APACHE II and IL-6 had certain predictive value for the prognosis of patients with sepsis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.754 (95%CI was 0.681-0.827) and 0.592 (95%CI was 0.511-0.673), P values were < 0.001 and 0.035, respectively. When the optimal cut-off value of APACHE II was 16.50 score, the sensitivity was 72.6% and the specificity was 69.9%. When the optimal cut-off value of IL-6 was 27.87 ng/L, the sensitivity was 67.2% and the specificity was 52.8%. Conclusions: APACHE II score and IL-6 level have certain predictive value for the prognosis of patients with sepsis, the higher APACHE II score and IL-6 level, the greater the probability of death in patients with sepsis.

Analysis of risk factors about the prognosis in the critically ill patients of emergency room

Comparison of the Predictive Value of Scoring Systems on the Prognosis of Cirrhotic Patients with Suspected Infection

Lipid level and 28-days mortality among patients in urgency room

[Comparison of four early warning scores in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients in secondary hospitals]

Comparative evaluation of clinical scoring systems in prediction of severi-ty in acute pancreatitis

The influence of coagulation dysfunction to the prognosis in the critically ill patients of emergency room

Study of different score systems on predicting outcomes in severe patients of emergency departments

Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 in Predicting Hospital Mortality in Emergency Intensive Care Unit

Comparison of SAPS 3-PIRO Score with Other Four Scoring Systems for Assessing Sepsis

[Expression level of cytokines in patients with sepsis and its effect on prognosis]

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NOMOGRAM FOR PREDICTING 28-DAY IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN SEPSIS PATIENTS BASED ON AN OPTIMIZED ACUTE PHYSIOLOGY AND CHRONIC HEALTH EVALUATION II SCORE

[The Comparison of Different Clinical Scoring Systems for Predicting Prognosis in Acute Pancreatitis Based on the Revised Atlanta Classification].

Analysis of predicting factors of condition and prognosis in patients with sepsis

Investigate Predictive Capacity of In-Hospital Mortality of Four Severity Score Systems on Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

Application Value of MEWS,PSS,PARS in the Prognosis Evaluation of Patients in Rescue Room of Emergency Department

A evaluation model based on conventional blood parameters for the abdominal critically ill surgical patients

The usefulness of lactate/albumin ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, procalcitonin/albumin ratio, SOFA, and qSOFA in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis who presented to EDs

Performance of Three Prognostic Models in Patients with Cancer in Need of Intensive Care in a Medical Center in China.

Comparison Between Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ and Ⅳ in Mortality Risk Prediction of 192 Servere Acute Pancreatitis Patients

The combination of lactate level, lactate clearance and APACHE II score better predicts short-term outcomes in critically Ill patients: a retrospective cohort study

Predictive Value of Early Arterial Blood Gas Analysis in Prognosis of Sepsis Patients