Abstract:Yingying Huang, 1, &ast Shaowei Jiang, 1, &ast Wenjie Li, 1 Yiwen Fan, 2 Yuxin Leng, 3 Chengjin Gao 1 1 Emergency Department, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Pathology Medicine Biology, The University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; 3 Critical Care Medicine Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Chengjin Gao; Yuxin Leng Email ; Background: A modified scoring system based on the RDW, AGE, SOFA, and APACHE II score (RAAS score) was composed to investigated the short-, medium-, and long-term high risk of mortality in patients with sepsis identified early in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Data were collected from a total of 1066 sepsis patients in emergency department, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from March 2013 to April 2021, including 529 patients in the primary cohort and 537 patients in the validation cohort. By comparing each parameter and the area under ROC (AUC) and K-M (Kaplan–Meier) survival curve in different periods, valuable parameters were screened out to form a new scoring system, and finally the prediction model of the nomogram was built. Results: The RAAS scoring system, consisting of RDW, AGE, SOFA and APACHE II, is a 0– 6 scale to reflect the severity of sepsis. AUC at 30, 60, and 90 days was 0.816, 0.815, and 0.820, respectively. K-M curves across six prognostic time periods in both databases showed survival probabilities with different RDW segments and RAAS scores. In the calibration curve, the results of the internal validation of the primary cohort and the results of the external validation cohort showed the prognostic accuracy of RAAS. Conclusion: The RAAS score system is a novel and reliable indicator to predict the short-term and medium-term mortality of patients with sepsis. With the increase of the RAAS score, the mortality of patients with sepsis gradually increases. Keywords: sepsis, risk factors, prognosis, mortality, nomograms Sepsis is a serious, life-threatening syndrome that is one of the leading causes of death in hospitals. 1,2 Sepsis was also among the leading causes of the death associated with COVID-19. 3 Despite significant advances in critical care, sepsis still has a relatively high short-term mortality rate due to organ failure due to a dysregulated response to infection. 4 Often as the first place where sepsis patients are initially treated, it is significant for the emergency department (ED) to identify patients with a high mortality rate among sepsis patients in the early stages of sepsis, in order to provide more timely and adequate interventions for these patients and to help patients be properly classified. 5 Up to now, there is still no effective treatment and means for sepsis. 6 Early prediction of progressive septic shock plays an important role in its clinical course and prognosis. 7 Although several biomarkers have been studied to predict mortality in patients with sepsis, none of these biomarkers have been shown to reliably identify patients at high risk for sepsis, and tests for these biomarkers are often not widely used in clinical practice. 8 Moreover, due to the complexity of sepsis, the diagnostic accuracy of each parameter is limited in clinical practice. As a standard to evaluate the severity of disease in intensive care unit (ICU), scoring system has become an important tool to help clinicians make decisions. 9 A scoring system with higher prognostic accuracy has been developed that combines four clinical indicators to predict the mortality of patients with sepsis using a score of 0 to 6, with one point awarded for each value that meets the scoring requirement ( Supplementary Table 1 ). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of RAAS on short-term (30 days), medium-term (60 days, 90 days) and long-term (180 days, 365 days, 730 days) mortality in patients with sepsis using a large clinical database, and then to establish nomograms of the effective prediction period to visually predict the 30-day,60-day and 90-day mortality probability in patients with sepsis. The RAAS score has a great predictive function for the evaluation of the prognosis of death in sepsis. We conducted a retrospective observational study on 1066 patients with sepsis between March 2013 and April 2021. According to the time point, 529 patients were selected as the primary coh -Abstract Truncated-

Study of different score systems on predicting outcomes in severe patients of emergency departments

Comparative study of the MEWS score,SIRS score and APACHE Ⅱ score in the evaluation of the prognosis of patients with craniocerebral trauma in emergency department

Comparison of SAPS 3-PIRO Score with Other Four Scoring Systems for Assessing Sepsis

Comparison of the Predictive Value of Scoring Systems on the Prognosis of Cirrhotic Patients with Suspected Infection

The application value of SCS scoring system in emergency department

Comparison of Four Severity Assessment Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients for Predicting Patient Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study From a Single Tertiary Center in Central India

Comparison of Three Different Organ Failure Assessment Score Systems in Predicting Outcome of Severe Sepsis

Performance of sequential organ failure assessment, logistic organ dysfunction and multiple organ dysfunction score in severe sepsis within Chinese intensive care units.

The application value of rapid sequential organ failure score in predicting the risk of death in emergency critical patients

Analysis of risk factors about the prognosis in the critically ill patients of emergency room

[Comparison of four early warning scores in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients in secondary hospitals]

Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 in Predicting Hospital Mortality in Emergency Intensive Care Unit

Development and Validation of a Sepsis Mortality Risk Score for Sepsis-3 Patients in Intensive Care Unit

Performance of the MEDS score in predicting mortality among emergency department patients with a suspected infection: a meta-analysis.

Using machine learning tools to predict outcomes for emergency department intensive care unit patients

Establishment and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Scoring System-RAAS (RDW, AGE, APACHE II, SOFA) for Sepsis by a Retrospective Analysis

The value of five scoring systems in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory failure

Performance of the MEDS Score in Predicting Mortality among Emergency Department Patients with a Suspected Infection: a Meta-Analysis

Internal Validation of the Predictive Performance of Models Based on Three ED and ICU Scoring Systems to Predict Inhospital Mortality for Intensive Care Patients Referred from the Emergency Department

Investigate Predictive Capacity of In-Hospital Mortality of Four Severity Score Systems on Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury

Evaluating Prognostic Bias of Critical Illness Severity Scores Based on Age, Sex, and Primary Language in the United States: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.