Abstract:Objective: To explore the predictive value of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and modified early warning score (MEWS) in evaluating the prognosis of patients in intensive care unit (ICU) of secondary hospitals, and to provide guidance for clinical application. Methods: The clinical data of adult critical patients admitted to the ICU of Wanzhou District First People's Hospital from October 2022 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the clinical outcome of ICU, the patients were divided into improvement group and death group. The general information, blood routine, heart, liver and kidney function indicators, coagulation indicators, blood gas analysis, APACHE II score, SOFA score, qSOFA score, MEWS score at the time of admission to the ICU, the number of cases of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and continuous blood purification (CBP) were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis was performed, and multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the related factors of death. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to analyze the predictive value of the four scores in ICU patients. Results: A total of 126 patients were included, of which 45 patients died in the ICU and 81 patients improved and transferred out. Univariate analysis of death-related critically ill patients showed that procalcitonin (PCT), serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin (ALB), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial prothrombin time (APTT), D-dimer, pH value, HCO3-, blood lactic acid (Lac), number of patients treated with IMV and CBP, APACHE II score, SOFA score, qSOFA score and MEWS score were significantly different between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the APACHE II score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.115, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.025-1.213, P = 0.011], SOFA score (OR = 1.204, 95%CI was 1.037-1.398, P = 0.015), MEWS score (OR = 1.464, 95%CI was 1.102-1.946, P = 0.009), and APTT (OR = 1.081, 95%CI was 1.015-1.152, P = 0.016) were independent risk factors affecting the mortality of critically ill patients in the ICU. ROC curve analysis showed that APACHE II, SOFA, qSOFA, and MEWS scores could predict the prognosis of critically ill ICU patients, among which SOFA score had the strongest predictive effect, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.808. There was a statistically significant difference in the time required for the four scores (F = 117.333, P < 0.001), among which the MEWS scoring required the shortest time [(1.03±0.39) minutes], and the APACHE II scoring required the longest time [(2.81±1.04) minutes]. Conclusions: APACHE II, SOFA, qSOFA, and MEWS scores can be used to assess the severity of critically ill patients and predict in-hospital mortality. The SOFA score is superior to other scores in predicting severity. The MEWS is preferred because its assessment time is shortest. Early warning score can help secondary hospitals to detect potentially critical patients early and provide help for clinical rapid urgent emergency decision-making.

Application of APACHE Ⅱ Scoring System in Nursing Administration of SICU

Design and Clinical Application of an Information Module for Delirium Assessment in ICU

The Design and Clinical Application of a Multidisciplinary Round Electronic Checklist in ICU

A comparison between poisoning severity score (PSS) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE-Ⅱ) in poisoning evaluation

Using the Delphi method to establish nursing-sensitive quality indicators for ICU nursing in China.

[Clinical Application of Acutegastrointestinal Injury Grading System Assocaited with Clinical Severity Outcome in Critically Ill Patients: a Multi-Center Prospective, Observational Study].

Application of APACHE Ⅲ in ICU Targeted Surveillance

Study of different score systems on predicting outcomes in severe patients of emergency departments

The application value of SCS scoring system in emergency department

Comparison of Four Severity Assessment Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients for Predicting Patient Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study From a Single Tertiary Center in Central India

[Comparison of four early warning scores in predicting the prognosis of critically ill patients in secondary hospitals]

Role of APACHE II scoring system in the prediction of severity and outcome of acute intracerebral hemorrhage

Scoring of severity in patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit

The Diagnostic Value of Scoring Systems in Critical Acute Pancreatitis: a Single Center Retrospective Study

Comparison of modified early warning score and APACHEⅡ score in detecting developing critical illness

APACHE III Outcome Prediction in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with Sepsis Associated Acute Lung Injury.

Comparison of SAPS 3-PIRO Score with Other Four Scoring Systems for Assessing Sepsis

Assessment of APACHE II Score to Predict ICU Outcomes of Patients with AKI: A Single-center Experience from Haryana, North India

Implementing Three-Level Visit System in Critical Patients' Management

The effect of Decision-Support Systems on the nursing quality of critically ill patients

Performance of sequential organ failure assessment, logistic organ dysfunction and multiple organ dysfunction score in severe sepsis within Chinese intensive care units.