Abstract:Competence to stand trial is a legal construct used to identify those criminal defendants who have the requisite mental capacity to understand the nature and objective of the proceedings against them and to participate rationally in preparing their defense. This Practice Guideline has described how psychiatrists should evaluate individuals concerning their competence to stand trial. The Guideline describes acceptable forensic psychiatric practice for such evaluations. Where possible, it specifies standards of practice and principles of ethics and also emphasizes the importance of analyzing an individual defendant's case in the context of statutes and case law applicable in the jurisdiction where the evaluation takes place. The recommendations in the Guideline both reflect and are limited by evolving case law, statutory requirements, legal publications, and the current state of psychiatric knowledge. The authors have taken note of nationally applicable case law, federal constitutional standards, statutory language, and federal and state interpretations of the rights or statutes, recognizing that jurisdictions may differ in their specific interpretation or application of statutes or general constitutional standards. The review of cases concerning specific psychiatric diagnoses illustrates general U.S. trends, and psychiatrists must remain cognizant of their jurisdictions' interpretations of statutes or constitutional requirements. By surveying a variety of practices and approaches to data gathering and case analysis, the authors believe that this Guideline will stimulate additional collegial discussion about what is necessary and sufficient for adequate evaluations of adjudicative competence. The notion that psychiatrists should apply expertise to competence assessments stems from the principal that, before allowing a defendant to face criminal prosecution and possible punishment, courts need reasonable assurance--based, if necessary, on a careful, individualized evaluation--that the defendant has adequate mental capacity to make a defense. At a minimum, a psychiatrist's opinion about adjudicative competence should reflect an understanding of the jurisdictional standard and of how the defendant's mental condition affects competence as defined with the jurisdiction. The psychiatrist's report should clearly describe the opinion and the reasoning that leads to it. Psychiatrists who provide mental health expertise concerning adjudicative competence give trial courts information needed to assure that defendants can appropriately protect themselves and that criminal proceedings will be accurate, dignified,and just.

[The Creation of an Instrument to Determine Competency to Stand Trial].

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Preoperative Assessment of Readiness Tool among Surgical Patients

Constructing Validity of SCL 90 Applied to Chinese Non-Clinical Population

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (Srq-20) in Community Settings

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of self-reporting questionnaire for the screening of mental disorder among community population

AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial

Executive Functioning Deficits and Childhood Trauma in Juvenile Violent Offenders in China

Chinese Translation of the Coma Recovery Scale—Revised

The Reliability and Validity Study of the Diminished Responsibility Scale for Mentally Ⅲ Offenders

Development of a measure for assessing malingered incompetency in criminal proceedings: Denney competency related test (D-CRT)

Community-based evaluation of the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Mandarin Version of MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research in Patients with Schizophrenia

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB): Co-norming and Standardization in China.

Reliability and validity of Social-Adaptive Functioning Evaluation in China

Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings.

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Fonseca anamnestic index for temporomandibular disorders

Using the MMPI-2-RF to Characterize Defendants Evaluated for Competency to Stand Trial and Criminal Responsibility

What are the chances? – Validity assessment and the cumulative binomial distribution in the evaluation of fitness to stand trial

Verification and Preliminary Application of Chinese Version of Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale