Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Constructing Validity of SCL 90 Applied to Chinese Non-Clinical Population

Study on the Validity of the Symptom Check-List-90 of Chinese Version

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of self-reporting questionnaire for the screening of mental disorder among community population

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (Srq-20) in Community Settings

Chinese college students' SCL-90 scores and their relations to the college performance.

Study of the SCL-90 Scale and Changes in the Chinese Norms

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

The use and applicability of CPSHS and SCL-90 as screening tools for normal people

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Applicability of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale in Chinese

The Application of the Adult Self-Report and the Adult Behavior Checklist Form to Chinese Adults: Syndrome Structure, Inter-Informant Agreement, and Cultural Comparison

Reliability and validity of the Social Skills Checklist-Chinese version in patients with mental disorders

Establishing Chinese Middle-School Students' Mental-Health Norms with the Symptom Check List-90-R

Reliability And Validity Assessment Of The Revised Symptom Checklist 90 For Alopecia Areata Patients In China

Undergraduate Students’ Norms for the Chinese Version of the Symptom Check-List-90-r (SCL-90-R)

Cross-cultural validation of the Social Media Disorder scale

Study of psychological health of healthy volunteers by symptom checklist 90 (SCL-90) and eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQ)

Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings.

Primary Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Version

A detailed hierarchical model of psychopathology in Chinese clinical sample: Based on the SCL-90-R measure