Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded in 660 college students

GUO Ming-Zhu,GAN Yi-Qun
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To revise and introduce the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded(PANAS-X)developed by Waston and Clark,and examine its reliability and validity in China.Methods:Totally 660 college students completed a battery of structured questionnaires,including the Chinese Version of PANAS-X,Index of Well-Being,Index of General Affect,and Sympton Checkists-90(SCL-90).Results:The revised PANAS-X Scale consisted of 40 items,and 9 subscales.Exploratory factor analysis supported a nine-factor structure,and their cumulative contribution rate was 68.61%.Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the hypothesized nine-factor model(χ2/df=2.60,RMSEA=0.07,CFI=0.9).PANAS-X presented complicated relationships with the index of general affect and SCL-90,which were largely consistent to our expectation.The internal consistencies were between 0.639 and 0.905.The test-retest reliabilities of the nine subscales was 0.69 after 1 week and 0.64 after 1 month.Conclusion:The Chinese version of PANAS-X is reliable and valid for Chinese college students.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?