Abstract:The brief version of the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23) is a self-rated scale developed from the initial 95-item version of Borderline Symptom List (BSL-95). The current study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the BSL-23. A total of 570 undergraduate students and 323 clinical patients completed the BSL-23, the borderline subscale of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire (PDQ-4+), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11th version (BIS-11), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and the Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the one-factor structure of the BSL-23. Cronbach's alpha, Omega coefficient, Split-Half coefficient, Mean Inter-Item Correlation (MIC) and test-retest reliability were also measured. The correlations between the BSL-23 and other psychological variables were used to assess criterion-related validity and convergent validity. Participants who scored ≥ 5 on the borderline subscale of the PDQ-4+ were placed into the borderline personality disorder (BPD) screening-positive group, while the others were placed into the screening-negative group. Independent sample t-tests were performed to examine the differences in BSL-23 scores between the BPD screening-positive group and the BPD screening-negative group. The CFA results supported the one-factor structure of the BSL-23 in both samples. The internal consistency was high both in the undergraduate sample (Cronbach's α = 0.93, Omega = 0.95, Split-Half coefficient = 0.89, MIC = 0.38) and the clinical sample (Cronbach's α = 0.97, Omega = 0.97, Split-Half coefficient = 0.96, MIC = 0.56). The test-retest reliability within 2 weeks was 0.62. The BSL-23 displayed moderate to high correlations with the PDQ-4+-Borderline subscale, the CES-D, the BIS-11, the CTQ and the ASQ (r = 0.35 - 0.70). In addition, the BSL-23 discriminated between the BPD screening-positive and the BPD screening-negative participants, and also between the patient sample and undergraduate sample. In conclusion, the Chinese version of the BSL-23 has satisfactory psychometric properties to assess BPD symptoms.

White Bear Suppression Inventory:Structure,Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version

Chinese Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in A College Student Sample

Initial revision of Penn State Worry Questionnaire in Chinese college students

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded in 660 college students

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Perceived Stress Scale

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11

The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Social Phobia Inventory

Validation of the Emotional Intelligence Scale

Validity and reliability of the Social Suspiciousness Scale in college students

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of philadelphia mindfulness scale in college students

Reliability and Validity of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale among Chinese Civil Servants

Validation of a Chinese Version of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory–Short Version

Factorial Structure of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)-18 among Chinese Drug Users.

Reliability and validity of an adapted Chinese version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief Borderline Symptom List in Undergraduate Students and Clinical Patients

Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 Among Chinese Adults

Psychometric Properties of the Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire in Chinese University Students

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Mind-Wandering Questionnaire

Validation of the Thought-Action Fusion Scale among Chinese college students

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory

Reliability and Validity of Obsessive-compulsive Inventory-revised in Chinese College Students