Abstract:The purpose of this study was to differentiate clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration from normal fluctuations in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) following severe brain injury. We computed indices of responsiveness for the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) using data from a clinical trial of 180 participants with DoC. We used CRS-R scores from baseline (enrollment in a clinical trial) and a 4-week follow-up assessment period for these calculations. To improve precision, we transformed ordinal CRS-R total scores (0-23 points) to equal-interval measures on a 0-100 unit scale using Rasch Measurement theory. Using the 0-100 unit total Rasch measures, we calculated distribution-based 0.5 standard deviation (SD) minimal clinically important difference, minimal detectable change using 95% confidence intervals, and conditional minimal detectable change using 95% confidence intervals. The distribution-based minimal clinically important difference evaluates group-level changes, whereas the minimal detectable change values evaluate individual-level changes. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change are derived using the overall variability across total measures at baseline and 4 weeks. The conditional minimal detectable change is generated for each possible pair of CRS-R Rasch person measures and accounts for variation in standard error across the scale. We applied these indices to determine the proportions of participants who made a change beyond measurement error within each of the two subgroups, based on treatment arm (amantadine hydrochloride or placebo) or categorization of baseline Rasch person measure to states of consciousness (i.e., unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state). We compared the proportion of participants in each treatment arm who made a change according to the minimal detectable change and determined whether they also changed to another state of consciousness. CRS-R indices of responsiveness (using the 0-100 transformed scale) were as follows: 0.5SD minimal clinically important difference = 9 units, minimal detectable change = 11 units, and the conditional minimal detectable change ranged from 11 to 42 units. For the amantadine and placebo groups, 70% and 58% of participants showed change beyond measurement error using the minimal detectable change, respectively. For the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state groups, 54% and 69% of participants changed beyond measurement error using the minimal detectable change, respectively. Among 115 participants (64% of the total sample) who made a change beyond measurement error, 29 participants (25%) did not change state of consciousness. CRS-R indices of responsiveness can support clinicians and researchers in discerning when behavioral changes in patients with DoC exceed measurement error. Notably, the minimal detectable change can support the detection of patients who make a "true" change within or across states of consciousness. Our findings highlight that the continued use of ordinal scores may result in incorrect inferences about the degree and relevance of a change score.

Chinese Translation of the Coma Recovery Scale—Revised

Validation of the Chinese version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Preoperative Assessment of Readiness Tool among Surgical Patients

Evaluation of the consciousness scales in the diagnosis of the severely impaired consciousness

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Chinese/Mandarin Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-C/M)

The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Chinese Version Simplified Modified Rankin Scale Questionnaire(2011)

Rasch Analysis of the Chinese Version of the Nociception Coma Scale–Revised in Patients with Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

Reliability and validation of the Japanese version of the coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R)

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Diagnostic accuracy of the CRS-R index in patients with disorders of consciousness

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Self-Report Version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR): Rasch Psychometric Analysis and Online Application

The reliability and validity of a slightly revised Chinese version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire

The reliability and validity of a slightly optimized Chinese version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire

A Brief Overview of the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised: Updates From the COMBI

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Acute Coronary Syndrome Response Index (C-ACSRI).

Which information derived from the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised provides the most reliable prediction of clinical diagnosis and recovery of consciousness? A comparative study using machine learning techniques

Interpreting Change in Disorders of Consciousness Using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised

Adapted Simplified Chinese (mainland) Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale on Patients Who Have Undergone Laryngectomy