The reliability and validity of a slightly optimized Chinese version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire

Junliang yuan,yunxiao wang,Wenli Hu,Askiel Bruno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.13565/v1
2019-01-01
Abstract:Abstract Background: The slightly optimized English version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire smRSq(2011) was shown to be reliable, valid, and useful in scoring the modified Rankin scale (mRS) after stroke. Our aim was to assess the inter-rater reliability and validity of a novel Chinese version smRSq(2011). Methods: The English version smRSq(2011) was translated into Chinese by a standard process. We recruited 300 consecutive hospitalized ischemic stroke patients in the department of neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. Six randomly paired raters scored the conventional mRS, the novel Chinese version smRSq(2011), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the Barthel index (BI) in-person. Inter-rater reliability and validity were assessed. Results: Among the 300 ischemic stroke patients, mean age was 64.9±12.1 years, and 220 (73%) were male. For inter-rater reliability of the smRSq(2011), the percent agreement among raters was 87%, the kappa (κ) was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.88), and the weighted kappa (κw) was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98). The percent agreement between the conventional mRS and the smRSq(2011) was 63%, κ=0.57 (95% CI, 0.50-0.63) and κw=0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). In construct validity testing, the Spearman’s correlation coefficients comparing the smRSq(2011) to the NIHSS and the BI were 0.83 (P<0.001) and 0.86 (P<0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggest usefulness of the novel Chinese version smRSq(2011) in scoring the mRS in Chinese stroke patients. Further validation in other clinical settings, including in communities and by remote methods in China is warranted.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?