Abstract:In Brief Study Design. A multicenter cross-cultural study to re-evaluate the reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Objective. To assess the concurrent validity and reliability of this instrument in mainland China. Summary of Background Data. The SRS-22 Questionnaire was developed to assess the health-related quality of life for patients with scoliosis in the United States. More recently, the reliability and validity analyses of traditional and simplified Chinese versions of this questionnaire were performed, respectively. However, with respect to the diversity of population and large proportion of rural patients in China, a multicenter study might be necessary to re-evaluate its adaptation. Methods. The original English version of the SRS-22 Questionnaire was translated into simplified Chinese. Considering the different health care systems in mainland China, the question 15 was modified; the respondent might be the parent if the patient was younger than 18 years. This multicenter study was performed by 13 scoliosis surgeons involving seven spine centers. The SRS-22 Questionnaire and a previously validated 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire were given to 391 patients with idiopathic scoliosis or congenital scoliosis without neurologic deficits. Of those, 136 patients were randomly selected for a second identical SRS-22 Questionnaire filled 1 week later and mailed back with a stamped return envelope. Results. A total of 333 patients fully completed both SRS-22 and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaires. Good consistency was observed for all the five domains of the SRS-22. Poorer internal consistency was found in questions 15 and 18. If question 15 was excluded, the α coefficient would increase to 0.68. The pain domain of SRS-22 had a high ceiling effect being 67.5%. The test-retest reproducibility was observed “good” in the pain domain and “excellent” for the remaining domains of SRS-22 Questionnaire. Good (10 domains) and moderate (23 domains) correlations were demonstrated while seven domains had poor correlation. Conclusion. The simplified Chinese version of the SRS-22 Questionnaire was re-evaluated by a multicenter study to respect the diversity of population and cultural differences in mainland China, which showed good internal consistency and satisfactory test-retest reproducibility. It might be useful for clinical evaluation of Chinese adolescents and young adults with scoliosis treated with bracing or surgery, although it also encountered previously reported difficulties with some of the items related to different cultures and health care systems. A multicenter cross-cultural adaptation of simplified Chinese Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire was evaluated for 333 patients including those treated with bracing or surgery in mainland China, showing good internal consistency and satisfactory test-retest reproducibility. It should be used to evaluate Chinese adolescents and young adults with scoliosis.

Replication and Extension of the Simplified Modified Rankin Scale in 150 Chinese Stroke Patients

The reliability and validity of a slightly revised Chinese version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire

The reliability and validity of a slightly optimized Chinese version simplified modified Rankin scale questionnaire

The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Chinese Version Simplified Modified Rankin Scale Questionnaire(2011)

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

A Chinese version of the Stroke Illness Perception Questionnaire‐Revised: Reliability and validity assessment in stroke patients

Validation of the Machine Learning–Based Stroke Impact Scale With a Cross-Cultural Sample

Abstract WP85: Evaluating the Strengths and Limitations to Patient-Reported Modified Rankin Scale Studies: A Systematic Review

Chinese Translation of the Coma Recovery Scale—Revised

The study on reliability,validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of Stroke-specific Quality of Life

Validation of the Chinese version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

An automated flowchart for the Modified Rankin Scale assessment: a multicenter inter-rater agreement analysis

Reliability and validity of the Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients (Chinese version) for patients with nonaphasic stroke

The Stroke Stigma Scale: a reliable and valid stigma measure in patients with stroke

Reliability of Chinese Version of Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test for Stroke Patients

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

Re-evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Simplified Chinese Version of SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire

Testing the psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of SATIS-Stroke in people with chronic stroke

Abstract 142: Automated Text-Messaging System for Assessment of 90-day Modified Rankin Scale After Stroke

Validity and Reliability of the Mandarin Version of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire among Stroke Patients in Mainland China.

Translation and Validation of the Chinese Self-Report Version of Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-SR): Rasch Psychometric Analysis and Online Application