User testing of the psychometric properties of pictorial-based disability assessment Longshi Scale by healthcare professionals and non-professionals: a Chinese study in Shenzhen.
Yulong Wang,Shanshan Guo,Jiejiao Zheng,Qing Mei Wang,Yuling Zhang,Zhenwen Liang,Lihai Zhang,Yi Yang,Haohan Zhai,Miaoling Chen,Yuzhen Wang,Yawei Li,Xing Lyu,Xuhui Li,Hongli Geng,Xiaolong Zhu,Fei Yu,Jian Yuan,Jing Zhou,Fang Liu,Haoming Luo,Jianjun Long,Wensheng Chen,Hua Li,Guanqi Fu,Chunxiu Zhou,Jiehong Zhang,Yao Wang,Yongyang Huo,Xiujun Ke,Yuanyuan Zeng,Jiayu Liu,Hailan Xing,Huixiang Xiao,Rui Jiao,Miao Wu,Qiang Tang,Xun Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215519846543
2019-01-01
Clinical Rehabilitation
Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to validate a novel pictorial-based Longshi Scale for evaluating a patient's disability by healthcare professionals and non-professionals. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Rehabilitation departments from a grade A, class 3 public hospital, a grade B, class 2 public hospital, and a private hospital and seven community rehabilitation centers. Subjects: A total of 618 patients and 251 patients with functional disabilities were recruited in a two-phase study, respectively. Main measures: Outcome measure: pictorial scale of activities of daily living (ADLs, Longshi Scale). Reference measure: Barthel Index. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the validity of Longshi Scale against Barthel Index. Results: In phase 1 study, from March 2016 to August 2016, the results demonstrated that the Longshi Scale was both reliable and valid (intraclass correlation coefficient based on two-way random effect (ICC2,1) = 0.877-0.974 for intra-rater reliability; ICC2,1 = 0.928-0.979; kappa = 0.679-1.000 for inter-rater reliability; intraclass correlation coefficient based on one-way random effect (ICC1,1) = 0.921-0.984 for test-retest reliability and Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.836-0.899). In the second phase, in March 2018, results further demonstrated that the Longshi Scale had good inter-rater and intra-rater reliability among healthcare professionals and non-professionals including therapists, interns, and personal care aids (ICC1,1 = 0.822-0.882 on Day 1; ICC1,1 = 0.842-0.899 on Day 7 for inter-rater reliability). In addition, the Longshi Scale decreased assessment time significantly, compared with the Barthel Index assessment (P < 0.01). Conclusion: The Longshi Scale could potentially provide an efficient way for healthcare professionals and non-professionals who may have minimal training to assess the ADLs of functionally disabled patients.