Abstract:Objective: Recent consensus guidelines have advocated for the use of multivariate performance validity assessment on ability-based measures such those used in neuropsychological assessment. Further, previous research has demonstrated that aggregating performance validity indicators may produce superior classification accuracy. The present study builds upon this research by aggregating data from three of the most commonly used performance validity measures (Test of Memory Malingering [TOMM], Rey Fifteen Item Test with recognition trial [FIT plus recognition], and Reliable Digit Span [RDS]) to create a performance validity composite measure in a veteran mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) population. Participants and Methods: Data of patients evaluated at a VA hospital who had completed the RDS, FIT plus recognition, and TOMM as part of their clinical neuropsychological evaluation were analyzed (n = 20). Two composite performance validity indexes were created: a Single Cutoff Performance Validity Index (SC-PVI), which measures the quantity of failures across performance validity measures (PVMs) by summing the total number of PVM failures, and a Multiple Cutoff Performance Validity Index (MC-PVI) which measures the number of failures as well as degree of failure(s) across measures of performance validity (e.g., a participant would attain a score of 3 if their PVM performance failed to reach a conservative cut point; they would obtain a score of 1 if they met conservative cut point, yet failed to reach a liberal cut point). Results: Only one participant (5%) attained a score of 0 on the SC-PVI (i.e., passing all PVTs using standard cutoffs) and MC-PVI (i.e., passing the most liberal cut points on all three PVMs). Conversely, eight participants (40%) attained a score of 3 on the SC-PVI (i.e., failed all three PVMs) and four participants (20%) attained a score of 9 (i.e., failed the most conservative cut points on all three PVMs). Results showed a significant (p < .001) ordinal association between the two indices (G = .984); however, there was no significant agreement between SC-PVI and MC-PVI models (k = -.087; p = .127). Conclusions: Data revealed discordant findings between the three PVMs utilized. The majority of participants (75%) scored between 2-8 on the MC-PVI, meaning that they did not exceed all liberal cut points or fail all conservative cut points. These "grey area" scores suggest an indeterminate range of performance validity, which cannot be captured by a solitary cut point or neatly classified as pass or fail. The utility of multiple cutoff performance validity models (i.e., aggregating PVMs to consider the severity of failure and number of failures) is that they capture the nuance of these data when determining and discussing the credibility of a profile. Multiple cut point data also highlight how the choice of cutoff influences the outcome of performance validity research and clinical decision making. As such, future research on the classification accuracy of this MC-PVI is needed.

What are the chances? – Validity assessment and the cumulative binomial distribution in the evaluation of fitness to stand trial

Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury

Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Comparative analysis of freestanding and embedded performance validity tests

Cross-Validation of Supplemental Test of Memory Malingering Scores as Performance Validity Measures

AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial

Trauma in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations

Development of a measure for assessing malingered incompetency in criminal proceedings: Denney competency related test (D-CRT)

Malingering assessment after severe traumatic brain injury in forensic psychology with a potential embedded symptom validity indicator of Symptom Checklist 90

Further examination of embedded performance validity indicators for the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test and Brief Test of Attention in a large outpatient clinical sample

Use of perceptual memory as a performance validity indicator: initial validation with simulated mild traumatic brain injury

Assessing performance validity during attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder evaluations: Cross-validation of non-memory embedded validity indicators

81 An Examination of a Multiple Cutoff Performance Validity Index

Fitness to stand trial: 415 consecutive defendants assessed by a New Zealand forensic psychiatry service

Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) and Inventory of Problems–Memory (IOP-M) failure rates in patients with severe psychosis with and without criminal convictions

Developing a Symptom Validity Test for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Application of the binomial distribution

Study of Affecting Factors of Mental Disorder Offender's Competency to Stand Trial

Using the MMPI-2-RF to Characterize Defendants Evaluated for Competency to Stand Trial and Criminal Responsibility

Detecting malingering mental illness in forensics: Known-Group Comparison and Simulation Design with MMPI-2, SIMS and NIM

Psychometric implications of failure on one performance validity test: a cross-validation study to inform criterion group definition

IQ thresholds and influence of the assessor's professional discipline on fitness to stand trial assessment outcomes in Aotearoa New Zealand