Abstract:This paper presents a comparison of P-Delta effects on the nonlinear seismic behavior of the steel moment-resisting frame structures (MRFs) subjected to near-fault and far-fault ground motions. The 3-, 9- and 20-story MRFs designed for the American SAC Phase II Steel Project are used as benchmark models. The 40 near-fault ground motions with large velocity pulses, as well as ten typical far-fault ground motions, are selected and scaled for the nonlinear time-history analysis. The P-Delta effect is quantified based on peak inter-story drift ratio (PIDR) demands. The displacement demands of the whole structure and the distortion of the structural components are compared and analyzed. It was found that, at each floor, the P-Delta effect under near-fault ground motions is more significant than that under the far-fault ground motions. The P-Delta effect under near-fault ground motions also increases more rapidly with decreasing structure height even for low-rise structures or low earthquake intensity. It was also found that the P-Delta effect cause the PIDR demands to increase by 10% for all three structures subjected to far-fault ground motions. In contrast, considering the P-Delta effect, the PIDR demands rapidly increase by 45% for the high-rise building subjected to near-fault ground motions. Note that the increasing PIDR demands occur at the weakest floor and with the stronger earthquake intensity. However, the P-Delta effect does not change the location of the weakest floor and the yield sequence of components. The seismic behaviors under far-fault and near-fault ground motions are significantly different, because near-fault ground motions not only have velocity pulse but also possibly trigger structural higher vibration modes. In addition, the P-Delta effect may change the distortion direction of the components so that the prediction of the structural collapse direction may be affected. In addition, it was found that if the structure’s period is near the pulse period, the P-Delta effect becomes more significant with the increase of earthquake intensity, and accordingly, it should not be ignored. Moreover, the P-Delta effect cannot be neglected either for the structures susceptible to near-fault ground motions, even if those structures are not tall or the earthquake intensity is not strong.

Dynamic P-△ Effects on Seismic Force Modification Factors

Static and dynamic inelastic P -Δ effect for seismic design

Seismic Force Modification Factors for Modified-Clough Hysteretic Model

Inelastic Displacement Amplification Factor for Ductile Structures with Constant Strength Reduction Factor

Seismic Force Modification Factor for Ductile Structures

SEISMIC-FORCE-MODIFICATION FACTOR FOR STRUCTURES WITH BILINEAR ELASTOPLASTIC MODEL

SEISMIC FORCE MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR STRUCTURES WITH SHEAR-SLIP HYSTERETIC MODEL

Seismic Force with Different Ductility Factor in Strength Degrading System

Inelastic Spectrum Normalization Considering P-Δ Effects

Yield Point Spectra with constant ductility

Inelastic Yielding Strength Demand Coefficient Spectra

Spectra of Seismic Force Reduction Factors of MDOF Systems Normalized by Two Characteristic Periods

Normalized Inelastic Deformation Ratio Spectra

Analysis of influence of dynamic characteristics of structures on strength reduction factors

P-Δ Effect on Inelastic Displacement Ratio Spectra for Inelastic Structures

P-Delta Effects on Nonlinear Seismic Behavior of Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Structures Subjected to Near-Fault and Far-Fault Ground Motions

The Modification of Strength Reduction Factors for MDOF Effect

Study on Seismic Collapse Capacity of Single-Degree-of-freedom Structural System

Influence analysis of structural dynamic parameters on strength reduction factors

The Damping Effect on Constant-Ductility Seismic Demand Spectra of Inelastic Structures

Probability-based analytical model for predicting the post-earthquake residual deformation of SDOF systems