Study on crystallographic and magnetic properties of Y1-xDyxFe11Mo and Y1-xDyxFe11MoNy (x=0-1.0)
Chang-Ping Yang,Yi-Zhong Wang,Bo-Ping Hu,Jiang-Li Wang,Zhen-Xi Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00374-6
IF: 3.097
1999-01-01
Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
Abstract:The variation in crystallographic and magnetic properties with Dy concentration has been investigated on Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y compounds in detail. Lattice parameters a, c and saturation magnetization M s at 1.5 K decrease while the Curie temperature T c slightly increases with increasing Dy concentration in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo system. At room temperature, all Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo samples exhibit a uniaxial anisotropy, and the anisotropy field decreases with increasing Dy concentration. Upon nitrogenation, the nitrides Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y retain the tetragonal structure symmetry of ThMn 12 type with the addition of an expansion of about 4% on the unit cell volume. The Curie temperature and saturation magnetization at 1.5 K are drastically enhanced by nitrogenation. Unlike the parent alloy, YFe 11 MoN y shows a canted anisotropy at room temperature. But the other Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y compounds with x⩾0.2 have a uniaxial anisotropy which becomes stronger with increasing Dy concentration. Keywords Rare-earth iron compound Magnetic properties Anisotropy 1 Introduction In 1990, Coey and his colleagues found a profound change occurring on the Curie temperature, saturation magnetization and anisotropy in Sm 2 Fe 17 N y which was formed from the parent alloy Sm 2 Fe 17 by a solid gas reaction [1,2] . In 1991, Yang et al. successfully performed the similar nitrogen absorption experiment on NdFe 11 TiN y in which the saturation magnetization and Curie temperature were enhanced compared to its parent alloy NdFe 11 Ti. Especially, upon nitrogenation, the anisotropy was drastically modified from a weak uniaxial to a strong uniaxial anisotropy with a room temperature magnetocrystalline anisotropy field of μ 0 H a =8.0 tesla (T) for NdFe 11 TiN y [3,4] . A lot of efforts were focused on the nitrides of R(Fe,M) 12 N y (R=light rare earth, M=Ti, Cr, Mo) based on its excellent intrinsic properties [5–13] . Last year, anisotropic magnetic powders with a maximum energy product (BH) max =169.6 kJ/m 3 (21.2 MGOe ), intrinsic coercivity i H c =0.6 T , and remanence B r =1.02 T was achieved on Nd(Fe,Mo) 12 N y compound as an exploration for practical application [14] . In R(Fe,Mo) 12 N y compounds, a maximum anisotropy fields of μ 0 H a =15.2 T and 12.6 T occur on R=Tb and Dy at room temperature, respectively [15] . A small amount of Dy additives not only enhance the Curie temperature and anisotropy field at room temperature, but also benefit to easily form R(Fe,M) 12 (R=light rare earth) and its nitride [16] . In this work, we prepared a series of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and their nitrides, in order to investigate the variation in crystallographic and magnetic properties with Dy concentration. 2 Experimental details Ingots of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo with x=0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 were prepared by arc melting 99.9% starting materials and then vacuum annealed at 1050°C for 10 h. All parent alloys were found to be single phase with the ThMn 2 -type structure after checking by X-ray diffraction and thermomagnetic analysis. The nitrides were formed by heating the fine powders with a diameter of about 20 μm of the parent alloys at 600°C for 4.5 h in the atmosphere of high purity nitrogen at a pressure of 1.5 atm. The value of nitrogen concentration y in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y is about 1.0 after estimating by the difference of weight before and after nitrogenation. Curie temperatures T c were obtained from the thermomagnetic curves measured in a field of 40 mT. The saturation magnetization M s at 1.5 K was measured by an extracting-sample magnetometer in an applied field up to 7.0 T. The anisotropy characteristics of room temperature was checked by X-ray diffraction on magnetically aligned-powder sample. The anisotropy field μ 0 H a was determined by the singular point detection (SPD) technique [17] performed in a pulsed-field up to 25 T on the aligned samples which were magnetized along the perpendicular direction. 3 Result and discussion Studies of X-ray diffraction and thermomagnetic analysis indicate that all the Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo samples can be formed into pure single phase with the tetragonal ThMn 12 structure. Upon nitrogenation, Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y retains the same crystal structure as their parent compounds. Fig. 1 a and Fig. 1 b illustrates the X-ray diffraction patterns of a parent alloy and its corresponding nitride with x=0.2, respectively. It can be seen that the diffraction peaks of the nitride become wider and shifts to the positions with lower angles at a different movement which greatly depends on the diffraction angle of the peak. Generally, the shift for the diffraction peak at a high angle is larger than at low angle. For example, the shift of Δ 2θ is 0.98° for the peak (5 1 0) at 2θ=57.35° while Δ 2θ=0.58° for peak (2 2 0) at 2θ=29.6°. The result can be understood by Bragg's law. After performing the first derivative on Bragg reflection equation 2 d sin θ=nλ, we can write the following formula: Δ θ=−2( Δ d/d) tan θ, where d and Δ d are respectively, the interplanar distance and change on the interplanar distance by nitrogenation. θ is the Bragg reflection angle. We can see that the shifts of diffraction peaks by nitrogenation is proportional to tan θ. The lattice parameters a, c and unit cell volume V of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y were listed in Table 1 with those of their parent alloys shown in brackets. It can be seen that lattice parameters a, and c and V become larger upon nitrogenation. The increase ratio of Δ V/V on unit cell volume is about 4.0%. The result suggests that the enhancement of unit cell volume is not related to Dy concentration in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y compounds. Fig. 2 gives a typical thermomagnetic trace for the parent alloy and nitride with x=0.6. The curie temperature T c is derived from the thermomagnetic curve. The values of T c of the samples with different Dy concentration are listed in Table 1 and plotted in Fig. 3 . It can be seen that the Curie temperature has a slight increase with Dy concentration in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo . Upon nitrogenation, T c is remarkably enhanced about 160 K compared to their parent alloys. The enhancement in Curie temperature can be understood as a result of the expansion of unit-cell volume by introducing interstitial N atom [4] . It can be seen from Table 1 and Fig. 3 that the Curie temperature of the nitrides has a slight increase with Dy concentration like seen in their parent compounds Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo . It suggests the exchange interactions of Dy–Fe sublattice should be much smaller than that of Fe–Fe in both Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y system. Fig. 4 shows the Dy concentration dependence of saturation magnetization M s for Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and their nitrides at 1.5 K. The values of M s are also listed in Table 1 . It can be seen from Fig. 4 that M s considerably decreases with Dy concentration in both the parent alloys and their nitrides. The result is reasonable considering the magnetic moment of Dy 3+ ion is antiparallel to that of Fe atom in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y compounds. We can also see that M s is enhanced remarkably by nitrogenation. The average enhancement is about 20% and a maximum enhancement of about 32% occurs on the nitride sample with x=0.8. The average magnetic moment value of Fe atom, 〈μ Fe 〉=1.67 μ B and 〈μ Fe 〉=2.03 μ B , respectively, for YFe 11 Mo and YFe 11 MoN y at 1.5 K, are calculated using the experimental value of M s listed in Table 1 . The increase in the Fe moment from 1.67 μ B to 2.03 μ B by nitrogenation is a result of the changes of filling and splitting of 3d of Fe by interstitial N atom because of N atom possessing a larger electronegativity than that of Dy, Y and Fe [4] . Fig. 5 a and Fig. 5 b show the room temperature X-ray diffraction pattern on the magnetically aligned nitride sample with x=0 and 0.2, respectively. From Fig. 5 a, it can be seen that the (h k 0) diffraction peaks, which indicates easy plane anisotropy, together with the (0 0 2) peak related to easy c- axis anisotropy are found in the diffraction pattern of aligned sample with x=0. It suggests that YFe 11 MoN y has a canted anisotropy at room temperature. Our result on the anisotropy characterizes of Ye 11 MoN y is in good agreement with Ref. [18] but different from Ref. [19] which considered YFe 11 MoN y still keeping a uniaxial anisotropy at room temperature. There are different options on the anisotropy features of Y(Fe,Mo)N y compounds among different authors. For example, YFe 10.5 Mo 1.5 N y was considered as exhibiting a uniaxial anisotropy in Ref. [15] , but Ref. [18] believed it exhibiting a canted anisotropy and even an easy plane anisotropy could be expected to occur when x is more than 1.75. But all the authors believe that the anisotropy field is reduced by introducing N atom in the Y(Fe,Mo) 12 N y [15,18,19] . It means that N atom has a remarkable effect on the anisotropy of Fe-sublattice. Fig. 5 b shows the X-ray diffraction pattern on the aligned nitride sample with x=0.2. It can be seen that those (h k 0) peaks, including the strongest peak (4 0 0) in Y 0.8 Dy 0.2 Fe 11 MoN y , have disappeared and there is only reflection (0 0 2) left in the diffraction pattern. The same result was found on other samples with x>0.2. It indicates that the additional Dy element modified the anisotropy of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y from an easy plane to easy c axis anisotropy. As an example, Fig. 6 gives a typical singular point detector (SPD) curve on Y 0.6 Dy 0.4 Fe 11 MoN y . The anisotropy field μ 0 H a was determined as the average value of the field pointed by the arrows in d 2 M(B 0 )/ d t 2 curves. The data of μ 0 H a for the parent alloy and their nitride are listed in Table 1 and plotted in Fig. 7 . From Fig. 7 , it can be seen that with increasing Dy concentration the anisotropy field has a slight decrease on Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo , but an obvious increase on Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y up to the largest anisotropy field of 10.5 T of DyFe 11 MoN y . From the analysis of single crystal data of DyFe 11 Ti, Hu et al. [20] deduced the second-order crystal field coefficient A 20 =−32.3Ka −2 0 for Dy 3+ . This results in decreasing μ 0 H a of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo due to the plane anisotropy of the Dy sublattice. After nitrogenation, A 20 was changed from −30Ka −2 0 to +84.8Ka −2 0 calculated by Yang et al. [21] using the model of single ion. Therefore a remarkable increase in μ 0 H a with increasing Dy concentration could be understood due to the uniaxial anisotropy of Dy-sublattice since the sign of A 20 is changed from negative to positive. The change of sign of A 20 also can be explained by band charge model (BCM) which was proposed by Li et al. [22] . According to BCM theory, partial valance electrons outside the 5d or 6s shell of Dy atom will be transferred to N atom because N atom has a fairly larger electronegativity than that of Dy, then create a new additional charge center around the N atom at 2b site. Thus, between Dy 3+ ion and the new charge center of N atom, there is a new Coulomb electrostatic interaction which changes the crystal field interaction of Dy sublattice and the sign of A 20 . As a consequence, the anisotropy field of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y is enhanced by the uniaxial anisotropy contributing from Dy 3+ ion with a positive A 20 owing to the change of sign. The similar increase in anisotropy field due to the substitution of Dy for the other R element is also found in the nitrides of Dy 1−x Y x Fe 11.35 Nb 0.65 N y [23] and Dy 1−x Pr x Fe 10.5 V 1.5 N y system [16] . In conclusion, lattice parameters a, c and saturation magnetization M s at 1.5 K decrease but the Curie temperature T c slightly increases with the increase of Dy concentration in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo alloys. All the Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo samples show a uniaxial anisotropy at room temperature, and the anisotropy field decreases with increasing Dy concentration. Upon nitrogenation, the nitrides retain the structure of tetragonal ThMn 12 -type but expanding about 4.0% on unit cell volume, and drastic changes occur in the magnetic properties. The Curie temperature and saturation magnetization at 1.5 K are enhanced by about 160 K and 20%, respectively, compared to their parent alloys. At room temperature, YFe 11 MoN y shows a canted anisotropy. But Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y nitrides with x⩾0.2 exhibit a uniaxial anisotropy due to the change of the sign of the second-order crystal field coefficients A 20 . The anisotropy field of the nitride is rapidly enhanced with increasing Dy concentration till the largest value of 10.5 T on DyFe 11 MoN y . The great increase in anisotropy field by Dy substitution in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y indicates that Dy could be considered as having a beneficial influence on the magnetic properties of R(Fe,Mo) 12 N y . References [1] J.M.D. Coey Sun Hong J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 87 1990 L251 [2] Hong Sun J.M.D. Coey Y. Otani D.P.F. Hurley J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2 1990 6465 [3] Y.C. Yang, X.D. Zhang, L.S. Kong, Q. Pan, S.L. Ge, Proc. 11th Int. Workshop on Rare-earth Magnets and their Applications, Pittsburgh, PA, October 1990, vol. 2, p. 190. [4] Y.C. Yang X.D. Zhang L.S. Kong Q. Pan Solid State Commun. 78 1991 317 [5] K. Schnitzke L. Schultz J. Wecker M. Katter Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 1990 2853 [6] M.Q. Huang L.Y. Zhang B.M. Ma Y. Zheng J.M. Elbicki W.E. Wallace S.G. Sanker J. Appl. Phys. 70 1991 6027 [7] Y.Z. Wang G.C. Hadjipanayis J. Appl. Phys. 70 1991 6009 [8] M. Anagnostou C. Christides M. Pissas D. Niarchaos J. Appl. Phys. 70 1991 6012 [9] J.M.D. Coey Hong Sun D.P.F. Hurley J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 101 1991 310 [10] Y.C. Yang Q. Pan X.D. Zhang J. Yang M.H. Zhang Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 1992 2723 [11] Y.Z. Wang B.P. Hu X.L. Rao G.C. Liu J. Appl. Phys. 73 1993 6251 [12] Y.C. Yang Q. Pan B.P. Cheng X.D. Zhang J. Appl. Phys. 76 1994 6725 [13] Ying-Chang Yang, Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Physics of Magnetic Materials (ISPMM95'), Seoul, South Korea, August 21–25, 1995. [14] J.B. Yang W.H. Mao B.P. Cheng Y.C. Yang H. Xu B.S. Han S.L. Ge W.J. Ku Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 1997 3290 [15] Y.C. Yang Q. Pan X.D. Zhang M.H. Zhang C.L. Yang J. Appl. Phys. 74 1993 4066 [16] Jun Yang, Shengzhi Dong, Weihua Mao, Yingchang Yang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 152 (1996) 356. [17] G. Asti S. Rinaldi Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 45 1974 3600 [18] Yi-Zhong Wang, Bo-Ping Hu, Lin Song, Kai-Ying Wang, Gui-Chuan Liu, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6 (1994) 7085. [19] Hong Sun M. Akayama K. Tatami H. Fujii Physica B 183 1993 33 [20] Bo-Ping Hu, Hong-Shou Li, J.M.D. Coey, J.P. Gavigan, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 2221. [21] Ying-Chang Yang, Xie-Di Pei, Hai-Lin Li, Xiao-Dong Zhang, Lin-Shu Kong, Qi Pan, Ming-Hou Zhang, J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) 6574. [22] Hong-Shou Li, J.M. Cadogan, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 109 (1992) L153. [23] K.Y. Wang, C.Y. Pan, Y.Z. Wang, B.P. Hu, J.F. Hu, W.Y. Lai, Z.X. Wang, 1995 Intermag'95, San Autonio, Texas, USA, FE-07.