Abstract:The variation in crystallographic and magnetic properties with Dy concentration has been investigated on Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y compounds in detail. Lattice parameters a, c and saturation magnetization M s at 1.5 K decrease while the Curie temperature T c slightly increases with increasing Dy concentration in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo system. At room temperature, all Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo samples exhibit a uniaxial anisotropy, and the anisotropy field decreases with increasing Dy concentration. Upon nitrogenation, the nitrides Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y retain the tetragonal structure symmetry of ThMn 12 type with the addition of an expansion of about 4% on the unit cell volume. The Curie temperature and saturation magnetization at 1.5 K are drastically enhanced by nitrogenation. Unlike the parent alloy, YFe 11 MoN y shows a canted anisotropy at room temperature. But the other Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y compounds with x⩾0.2 have a uniaxial anisotropy which becomes stronger with increasing Dy concentration. Keywords Rare-earth iron compound Magnetic properties Anisotropy 1 Introduction In 1990, Coey and his colleagues found a profound change occurring on the Curie temperature, saturation magnetization and anisotropy in Sm 2 Fe 17 N y which was formed from the parent alloy Sm 2 Fe 17 by a solid gas reaction [1,2] . In 1991, Yang et al. successfully performed the similar nitrogen absorption experiment on NdFe 11 TiN y in which the saturation magnetization and Curie temperature were enhanced compared to its parent alloy NdFe 11 Ti. Especially, upon nitrogenation, the anisotropy was drastically modified from a weak uniaxial to a strong uniaxial anisotropy with a room temperature magnetocrystalline anisotropy field of μ 0 H a =8.0 tesla (T) for NdFe 11 TiN y [3,4] . A lot of efforts were focused on the nitrides of R(Fe,M) 12 N y (R=light rare earth, M=Ti, Cr, Mo) based on its excellent intrinsic properties [5–13] . Last year, anisotropic magnetic powders with a maximum energy product (BH) max =169.6 kJ/m 3 (21.2 MGOe ), intrinsic coercivity i H c =0.6 T , and remanence B r =1.02 T was achieved on Nd(Fe,Mo) 12 N y compound as an exploration for practical application [14] . In R(Fe,Mo) 12 N y compounds, a maximum anisotropy fields of μ 0 H a =15.2 T and 12.6 T occur on R=Tb and Dy at room temperature, respectively [15] . A small amount of Dy additives not only enhance the Curie temperature and anisotropy field at room temperature, but also benefit to easily form R(Fe,M) 12 (R=light rare earth) and its nitride [16] . In this work, we prepared a series of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and their nitrides, in order to investigate the variation in crystallographic and magnetic properties with Dy concentration. 2 Experimental details Ingots of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo with x=0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 were prepared by arc melting 99.9% starting materials and then vacuum annealed at 1050°C for 10 h. All parent alloys were found to be single phase with the ThMn 2 -type structure after checking by X-ray diffraction and thermomagnetic analysis. The nitrides were formed by heating the fine powders with a diameter of about 20 μm of the parent alloys at 600°C for 4.5 h in the atmosphere of high purity nitrogen at a pressure of 1.5 atm. The value of nitrogen concentration y in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y is about 1.0 after estimating by the difference of weight before and after nitrogenation. Curie temperatures T c were obtained from the thermomagnetic curves measured in a field of 40 mT. The saturation magnetization M s at 1.5 K was measured by an extracting-sample magnetometer in an applied field up to 7.0 T. The anisotropy characteristics of room temperature was checked by X-ray diffraction on magnetically aligned-powder sample. The anisotropy field μ 0 H a was determined by the singular point detection (SPD) technique [17] performed in a pulsed-field up to 25 T on the aligned samples which were magnetized along the perpendicular direction. 3 Result and discussion Studies of X-ray diffraction and thermomagnetic analysis indicate that all the Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo samples can be formed into pure single phase with the tetragonal ThMn 12 structure. Upon nitrogenation, Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y retains the same crystal structure as their parent compounds. Fig. 1 a and Fig. 1 b illustrates the X-ray diffraction patterns of a parent alloy and its corresponding nitride with x=0.2, respectively. It can be seen that the diffraction peaks of the nitride become wider and shifts to the positions with lower angles at a different movement which greatly depends on the diffraction angle of the peak. Generally, the shift for the diffraction peak at a high angle is larger than at low angle. For example, the shift of Δ 2θ is 0.98° for the peak (5 1 0) at 2θ=57.35° while Δ 2θ=0.58° for peak (2 2 0) at 2θ=29.6°. The result can be understood by Bragg's law. After performing the first derivative on Bragg reflection equation 2 d sin θ=nλ, we can write the following formula: Δ θ=−2( Δ d/d) tan θ, where d and Δ d are respectively, the interplanar distance and change on the interplanar distance by nitrogenation. θ is the Bragg reflection angle. We can see that the shifts of diffraction peaks by nitrogenation is proportional to tan θ. The lattice parameters a, c and unit cell volume V of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y were listed in Table 1 with those of their parent alloys shown in brackets. It can be seen that lattice parameters a, and c and V become larger upon nitrogenation. The increase ratio of Δ V/V on unit cell volume is about 4.0%. The result suggests that the enhancement of unit cell volume is not related to Dy concentration in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y compounds. Fig. 2 gives a typical thermomagnetic trace for the parent alloy and nitride with x=0.6. The curie temperature T c is derived from the thermomagnetic curve. The values of T c of the samples with different Dy concentration are listed in Table 1 and plotted in Fig. 3 . It can be seen that the Curie temperature has a slight increase with Dy concentration in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo . Upon nitrogenation, T c is remarkably enhanced about 160 K compared to their parent alloys. The enhancement in Curie temperature can be understood as a result of the expansion of unit-cell volume by introducing interstitial N atom [4] . It can be seen from Table 1 and Fig. 3 that the Curie temperature of the nitrides has a slight increase with Dy concentration like seen in their parent compounds Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo . It suggests the exchange interactions of Dy–Fe sublattice should be much smaller than that of Fe–Fe in both Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y system. Fig. 4 shows the Dy concentration dependence of saturation magnetization M s for Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and their nitrides at 1.5 K. The values of M s are also listed in Table 1 . It can be seen from Fig. 4 that M s considerably decreases with Dy concentration in both the parent alloys and their nitrides. The result is reasonable considering the magnetic moment of Dy 3+ ion is antiparallel to that of Fe atom in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo and Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y compounds. We can also see that M s is enhanced remarkably by nitrogenation. The average enhancement is about 20% and a maximum enhancement of about 32% occurs on the nitride sample with x=0.8. The average magnetic moment value of Fe atom, 〈μ Fe 〉=1.67 μ B and 〈μ Fe 〉=2.03 μ B , respectively, for YFe 11 Mo and YFe 11 MoN y at 1.5 K, are calculated using the experimental value of M s listed in Table 1 . The increase in the Fe moment from 1.67 μ B to 2.03 μ B by nitrogenation is a result of the changes of filling and splitting of 3d of Fe by interstitial N atom because of N atom possessing a larger electronegativity than that of Dy, Y and Fe [4] . Fig. 5 a and Fig. 5 b show the room temperature X-ray diffraction pattern on the magnetically aligned nitride sample with x=0 and 0.2, respectively. From Fig. 5 a, it can be seen that the (h k 0) diffraction peaks, which indicates easy plane anisotropy, together with the (0 0 2) peak related to easy c- axis anisotropy are found in the diffraction pattern of aligned sample with x=0. It suggests that YFe 11 MoN y has a canted anisotropy at room temperature. Our result on the anisotropy characterizes of Ye 11 MoN y is in good agreement with Ref. [18] but different from Ref. [19] which considered YFe 11 MoN y still keeping a uniaxial anisotropy at room temperature. There are different options on the anisotropy features of Y(Fe,Mo)N y compounds among different authors. For example, YFe 10.5 Mo 1.5 N y was considered as exhibiting a uniaxial anisotropy in Ref. [15] , but Ref. [18] believed it exhibiting a canted anisotropy and even an easy plane anisotropy could be expected to occur when x is more than 1.75. But all the authors believe that the anisotropy field is reduced by introducing N atom in the Y(Fe,Mo) 12 N y [15,18,19] . It means that N atom has a remarkable effect on the anisotropy of Fe-sublattice. Fig. 5 b shows the X-ray diffraction pattern on the aligned nitride sample with x=0.2. It can be seen that those (h k 0) peaks, including the strongest peak (4 0 0) in Y 0.8 Dy 0.2 Fe 11 MoN y , have disappeared and there is only reflection (0 0 2) left in the diffraction pattern. The same result was found on other samples with x>0.2. It indicates that the additional Dy element modified the anisotropy of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y from an easy plane to easy c axis anisotropy. As an example, Fig. 6 gives a typical singular point detector (SPD) curve on Y 0.6 Dy 0.4 Fe 11 MoN y . The anisotropy field μ 0 H a was determined as the average value of the field pointed by the arrows in d 2 M(B 0 )/ d t 2 curves. The data of μ 0 H a for the parent alloy and their nitride are listed in Table 1 and plotted in Fig. 7 . From Fig. 7 , it can be seen that with increasing Dy concentration the anisotropy field has a slight decrease on Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo , but an obvious increase on Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y up to the largest anisotropy field of 10.5 T of DyFe 11 MoN y . From the analysis of single crystal data of DyFe 11 Ti, Hu et al. [20] deduced the second-order crystal field coefficient A 20 =−32.3Ka −2 0 for Dy 3+ . This results in decreasing μ 0 H a of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo due to the plane anisotropy of the Dy sublattice. After nitrogenation, A 20 was changed from −30Ka −2 0 to +84.8Ka −2 0 calculated by Yang et al. [21] using the model of single ion. Therefore a remarkable increase in μ 0 H a with increasing Dy concentration could be understood due to the uniaxial anisotropy of Dy-sublattice since the sign of A 20 is changed from negative to positive. The change of sign of A 20 also can be explained by band charge model (BCM) which was proposed by Li et al. [22] . According to BCM theory, partial valance electrons outside the 5d or 6s shell of Dy atom will be transferred to N atom because N atom has a fairly larger electronegativity than that of Dy, then create a new additional charge center around the N atom at 2b site. Thus, between Dy 3+ ion and the new charge center of N atom, there is a new Coulomb electrostatic interaction which changes the crystal field interaction of Dy sublattice and the sign of A 20 . As a consequence, the anisotropy field of Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y is enhanced by the uniaxial anisotropy contributing from Dy 3+ ion with a positive A 20 owing to the change of sign. The similar increase in anisotropy field due to the substitution of Dy for the other R element is also found in the nitrides of Dy 1−x Y x Fe 11.35 Nb 0.65 N y [23] and Dy 1−x Pr x Fe 10.5 V 1.5 N y system [16] . In conclusion, lattice parameters a, c and saturation magnetization M s at 1.5 K decrease but the Curie temperature T c slightly increases with the increase of Dy concentration in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo alloys. All the Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 Mo samples show a uniaxial anisotropy at room temperature, and the anisotropy field decreases with increasing Dy concentration. Upon nitrogenation, the nitrides retain the structure of tetragonal ThMn 12 -type but expanding about 4.0% on unit cell volume, and drastic changes occur in the magnetic properties. The Curie temperature and saturation magnetization at 1.5 K are enhanced by about 160 K and 20%, respectively, compared to their parent alloys. At room temperature, YFe 11 MoN y shows a canted anisotropy. But Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y nitrides with x⩾0.2 exhibit a uniaxial anisotropy due to the change of the sign of the second-order crystal field coefficients A 20 . The anisotropy field of the nitride is rapidly enhanced with increasing Dy concentration till the largest value of 10.5 T on DyFe 11 MoN y . The great increase in anisotropy field by Dy substitution in Y 1−x Dy x Fe 11 MoN y indicates that Dy could be considered as having a beneficial influence on the magnetic properties of R(Fe,Mo) 12 N y . References [1] J.M.D. Coey Sun Hong J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 87 1990 L251 [2] Hong Sun J.M.D. Coey Y. Otani D.P.F. Hurley J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2 1990 6465 [3] Y.C. Yang, X.D. Zhang, L.S. Kong, Q. Pan, S.L. Ge, Proc. 11th Int. Workshop on Rare-earth Magnets and their Applications, Pittsburgh, PA, October 1990, vol. 2, p. 190. [4] Y.C. Yang X.D. Zhang L.S. Kong Q. Pan Solid State Commun. 78 1991 317 [5] K. Schnitzke L. Schultz J. Wecker M. Katter Appl. Phys. Lett. 57 1990 2853 [6] M.Q. Huang L.Y. Zhang B.M. Ma Y. Zheng J.M. Elbicki W.E. Wallace S.G. Sanker J. Appl. Phys. 70 1991 6027 [7] Y.Z. Wang G.C. Hadjipanayis J. Appl. Phys. 70 1991 6009 [8] M. Anagnostou C. Christides M. Pissas D. Niarchaos J. Appl. Phys. 70 1991 6012 [9] J.M.D. Coey Hong Sun D.P.F. Hurley J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 101 1991 310 [10] Y.C. Yang Q. Pan X.D. Zhang J. Yang M.H. Zhang Appl. Phys. Lett. 61 1992 2723 [11] Y.Z. Wang B.P. Hu X.L. Rao G.C. Liu J. Appl. Phys. 73 1993 6251 [12] Y.C. Yang Q. Pan B.P. Cheng X.D. Zhang J. Appl. Phys. 76 1994 6725 [13] Ying-Chang Yang, Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Physics of Magnetic Materials (ISPMM95'), Seoul, South Korea, August 21–25, 1995. [14] J.B. Yang W.H. Mao B.P. Cheng Y.C. Yang H. Xu B.S. Han S.L. Ge W.J. Ku Appl. Phys. Lett. 71 1997 3290 [15] Y.C. Yang Q. Pan X.D. Zhang M.H. Zhang C.L. Yang J. Appl. Phys. 74 1993 4066 [16] Jun Yang, Shengzhi Dong, Weihua Mao, Yingchang Yang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 152 (1996) 356. [17] G. Asti S. Rinaldi Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 45 1974 3600 [18] Yi-Zhong Wang, Bo-Ping Hu, Lin Song, Kai-Ying Wang, Gui-Chuan Liu, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 6 (1994) 7085. [19] Hong Sun M. Akayama K. Tatami H. Fujii Physica B 183 1993 33 [20] Bo-Ping Hu, Hong-Shou Li, J.M.D. Coey, J.P. Gavigan, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 2221. [21] Ying-Chang Yang, Xie-Di Pei, Hai-Lin Li, Xiao-Dong Zhang, Lin-Shu Kong, Qi Pan, Ming-Hou Zhang, J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) 6574. [22] Hong-Shou Li, J.M. Cadogan, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 109 (1992) L153. [23] K.Y. Wang, C.Y. Pan, Y.Z. Wang, B.P. Hu, J.F. Hu, W.Y. Lai, Z.X. Wang, 1995 Intermag'95, San Autonio, Texas, USA, FE-07.

Abstract:A systematic investigation of crystallographic and intrinsic magnetic properties of the hydrides R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) has been performed in this work. The lattice constants a, b , and c and the unit cell volume of R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y decrease with increasing rare-earth atomic number from Nd to Dy, except for Ce, reflecting the lanthanide contraction. Hydrogenation results in regular anisotropic expansions along the a -, b -, and c -axes in this series of hydrides. Abnormal crystallographic and magnetic properties of Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 H 6.5 , like Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 , suggest that the Ce ion is non-triply ionized. Hydrogenation leads to the increase in both Curie temperature for all the compounds and in the saturation magnetization at 4.2 K and RT for R 3 Fe 29− x V x with R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, and Dy, except for Tb. Hydrogenation also leads to a decrease in the anisotropy field at 4.2 K and RT for R 3 Fe 29− x V x with R=Y, Ce, Nd, Gd, Tb, and Dy, except for Sm. The Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 and Gd 3 Fe 28.4 V 0.6 show the larger storage of hydrogen with y =6.5 and 6.9 in these hydrides. PACS 75.50 75.60.E 75.10 75.20.H 75.30.G Keywords Magnetic properties Hydride Magnetization Anisotropy field Curie temperature 1 Introduction High performance permanent magnetic materials have attracted considerable attention. Intensive investigations of the R–Fe–T phase diagrams (R=rare earth, T=transition metal as a stabilizing element) located at the iron rich corner, led to the discovery of the novel R 2 (Fe,T) 19 phase [1,2] . Its real stoichiometric composition and crystallographic structure were determined as a Nd 3 (Fe,Ti) 29 -type structure with the monoclinic symmetry [3] and the A 2 /m space group [4] by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) and then confirmed by neutron powder diffraction [5,6] . Subsequent works on its interstitial nitrides and carbides indicated that the Sm 3 (Fe,Ti) 29 N y [7–9] compounds can be regarded as new candidates for hard magnet application, which further aroused a great upsurge in extensive studies of the R 3 (Fe,T) 29 compounds. Many members in this new families of R 3 (Fe,T) 29 compounds, such as R 3 (Fe,Ti) 29 (R=Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm [10–12] , Gd [13,14] , Tb [15] and Y [16,17] ), R 3 (Fe,V) 29 (R=Sm [18–20] , Y, Nd, Gd [18,20] , Ce, Tb, and Dy [20–22] ), R 3 (Fe,Cr) 29 (R=Ce, Nd [10,20,23] , Sm [10,19,20,24] , Gd, Tb, and Dy [20,25] ), Nd 3 (Fe,Mn) 29 [26] , R 3 (Fe,Mo) 29 (R= Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, and Y) [27–30] , have been formed one after another with a good single-phased quality. Recently, the Gd 3 (Fe,Nb) 29 compound with Nb [31] as a stabilizing element was also obtained. The crystallographic and magnetic properties of these compounds have been studied in detail by the authors and by some researchers in other papers. At the same time, much attention has been paid to the studies of their interstitial nitrides and carbides in order to develop new hard magnets. The nitrides Sm 3 (Fe,T) 29 N y (T= Ti [7,8,32] , V [19,33] , Cr [19,24,34,35] , and Mo [30] ) and the carbides Sm 3 (Fe,T) 29 C y (T=Ti [9,32] and Cr [36] ) were considered as new potential candidates for permanent magnet application. Up to now, a little note was taken to the investigation of hydride R 3 Fe 29− x T x H y . Only the studies of Nd 3 (Fe,Ti) 29 H y [11] and Sm 3 (Fe,T) 29 H y (T=Ti, V, and Cr) [19] were reported. There is every reason to believe that the hydrides of R 3 Fe 29− x T x also have fascinating metal and magnetic properties, because the metal hydrides are interesting materials for applications in the areas of heat pumps, cooling systems, and thermal storage medium. For this reason, a systematic study on the phase formation and intrinsic magnetic properties of the hydrides R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) has been performed in this work. 2 Sample preparation and experimental methods In order to prepare hydrides the alloys with the composition R 3 Fe 29− x V x (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) were prepared by arc melting the constituent elements with a purity of at least 99.9%, in an argon atmosphere. A 5–10% excess of rare-earth elements relative to the ideal stoichiometric composition was added to compensate the loss of the R during melting and annealing. The alloys were subsequently annealed in sealed quartz tubes under a protective argon atmosphere at 1183–1323 K for 1–5 days, in order to maximize the amount of R 3 Fe 29− x V x phase, and then by water quenched. The 3 : 29 single-phased character of alloys was examined by both X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu K α radiation and thermomagnetic analysis (TMA). Before preparing the hydride phase, the single-phased 3 : 29 alloys were pulverized into fine powders with a size of 100–1000 μm. Hydrogenation was performed by heating the fine powders in hydrogen at a pressure of 5 atm and at 573 K for R=Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, and Tb or at 673 K for R=Y and Dy for a period of 2–4 h in a high pressure container. The XRD patterns and TMA show that each nitride of R 3 Fe 29− x V x had a single phase with the same structure as that of the parent compound, except for a little α-Fe inside. The values of the vanadium content, given in this works, in the 3 : 29 compounds are the nominal ones, but they have good reliability because all the samples are almost single-phased except from little α-Fe. For example, the nominal compositions of Nd, Fe, and V in the Nd 3 Fe 27.0 V 2.0 sample are in agreement with the results of chemical analysis. The hydrogen concentration in each hydride R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y was deduced from the atmosphere pressure difference before and after hydrogenation, according to the gas state equation PV = nRT at a constant temperature. The 3 : 29 structure is an intermediate structure between the rhombohedral Th 2 Zn 17 (2 : 17R) and tetragonal ThMn 12 (1 : 12) structures consisting of a combination of the 2 : 17R and 1 : 12 units in a ratio of 1 : 1 [3] . It can be expressed as R 2 Fe 17 + RFe 12−x T x ⇒ R 3 Fe 29−x T x . Therefore, by estimating and deducting the excess hydrogen in the form of little rare-earth hydrides under a partial decomposition of the parent compound and a little α-Fe precipitation, we can estimate the hydrogen to be absorbed at about 6 atoms per formula unit with the upper limit according to the following relations: R 2 Fe 17 H 5 + RFe 12−x T x H 1 ⇒ R 3 Fe 29−x T x H 6 . TMA was performed in a low field of 0.04 T with a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) from room temperature (RT) to above the Curie temperature. XRD with Cu K α radiation was used to determine the lattice parameters. The similar preparation and measuring procedure of magnetically aligned samples, in order to obtain the saturation magnetization and magnetic anisotropy field at 4.2 K and RT, was described in our previous works [20] . 3 Results and discussion As several examples, Fig. 1 shows XRD patterns with Cu K α radiation for R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y, Ce, Tb, and Dy). The patterns shown can be quite well indexed assuming the Nd 3 (Fe,Ti) 29 -type structure with monoclinic symmetry and A 2 /m space group. As an example, the indices ( h , k , l ) of Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 H 6.5 are given in Fig. 1 b. The peak positions of the XRD for each hydride are shifted to lower angles compared to that for R 3 Fe 29− x V x (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) [20] which demonstrated the increase of the lattice parameters after hydrogenation. The crystallographic parameters of the hydrides were obtained by fitting the XRD patterns with monoclinic symmetry and A 2 /m space group. Table 1 gives the crystallographic parameters, the unit cell volume and the X-ray density ρ derived based on the analysis of XRD data for all hydrides investigated here, together with their parent compounds. It can be seen that the lattice constants a, b , and c and the unit cell volume V of R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y decrease with increasing rare-earth atomic number from Nd to Dy, except for Ce, reflecting the lanthanide contraction. A larger fraction of the interstitial hydrogen atoms in the Gd 3 Fe 28.4 V 0.6 H 6.9 resulted in a larger expansion of its lattice constants a, b , and c and the unit-cell volume upon hydrogenation compared with that of the Sm 3 Fe 26.7 V 2.3 H 4.8 . The decrease of unit cell volume leads to an increase in density with increasing rare-earth atomic number from Nd to Dy, except for Ce. The lattice constants of a, b , and c of Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 and Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 H 6.5 are unusually smaller than those of R 3 Fe 29− x V x and R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Nd and Sm). This abnormal property may originate from the Ce ions being as non-triply ionized in each series of R 3 Fe 29− x V x and R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y compounds. It is noticeable that Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 and Gd 3 Fe 28.4 V 0.6 show the maximum content of hydrogen with y =6.5 and 6.9 in this series of compounds with V as a stabilizing element. So they can be interesting candidates for further investigation in order to develop new hydrogen storage medium. Table 2 gives the expansions of the lattice parameters and the unit cell volume, the variations of the angle β and the X-ray density ρ upon hydrogenation for all hydrides compared with their parent compounds. It can be seen that the lattice expansions are different along the a -, b -, and c -axes for each hydride in this series of compounds. The regular anisotropic expansions of R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y , such as δa / a > δb / b > δc / c for R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, and Gd, and δa / a ≃ δb / b > δc / c for R=Tb and Dy, indicate that the expansions occur mainly in the basal c -plane rather than along the c -axis for all the hydrides. These results are in agreement with the hypothesis [19] that hydrogen atoms mainly occupy the 4i and 4f sites with A 2 /m space group (corresponding to the 4e 1 and 4e 2 sites with P2 1 /c space group [19,5] ) which are located in the basal plane referred to the 1 : 5 cell. After hydrogenation the average relative volume expansion is about 2%, except for Y and Ce in which the smaller and larger amount of the absorbed interstitial H atoms in their compounds resulted in the smallest and largest expansions of their unit-cell volumes. Fig. 2 shows thermomagnetic curves of R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) measured in a low field of 0.04 T on free powder samples and by using a VSM from RT to above the Curie temperature. The Curie temperature T C was deduced from M 2 – T plots, derived from the thermomagnetic curve M ( T ), by extrapolating M to zero. Hydrogenation leads to an increase in Curie temperature T C of R 3 Fe 29− x V x . The increase in Curie temperature of each hydride reaches about 60–110 K compared with its parent compound, except for R=Y and Sm which only increases about 10 and 20 K upon hydrogenation, respectively. Fig. 3 displays the magnetic isotherms at 4.2 K for the magnetically aligned samples of R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y(a), Ce(b), Nd(c), Sm(d), Gd(e), Tb(f), and Dy(g)) measured with a VSM. Fig. 4 shows the magnetic isotherms at RT for the magnetically aligned samples of R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y(a), Ce(b), Nd(c), Sm(d), Gd(e), Tb(f), and Dy(g)) measured by pulsed magnetic fields (PMF) up to 12 T, together with the singular-point-detection (SPD) signal plots (d M 2 /d t 2 versus H ). The SPD technique [37] was used to measure the anisotropy field H A of the magnetically aligned samples at RT. According to the SPD theory, a singularity in the second derivative of the magnetization M with respect to the magnetic field H can be observed at the anisotropy field H A . Similarly, this method can also be used to detect a first-order magnetization process (FOMP). Table 3 gives the saturation magnetization M S at 4.2 K and RT of the hydrides R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) and their parent compounds investigated here. The values of the saturation magnetization at 4.2 K and at RT were derived from the high-field data of the magnetization curves measured in the external field applied parallel to the alignment direction of the powder samples, based on the law of approach to saturation. Table 4 gives the Curie temperature T C , the saturation magnetization M S , and anisotropy field H A at 4.2 K and RT of the hydrides R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) and their parent compounds. In this table, the unit of the saturation magnetization at 4.2 K and at RT were converted from A m 2 /kg into μ B /f.u. for the physical discussions. The anisotropy field H A at 4.2 K was deduced from the interception of the two magnetization curves, by extrapolating the straight line parts, measured in magnetic field applied parallel and perpendicular to the alignment direction of the powder samples. The anisotropy field H A at RT was determined from the singularities in the SPD signal plots (d M 2 /d t 2 versus H ) or the interception of the two magnetization curves measured in a magnetic field applied parallel and perpendicular to the alignment direction of the powder samples. The experimental data of the saturation magnetization at RT and the anisotropy field at 4.2 K and RT, lacked in this table, for Dy 3 Fe 27.9 V 1.1 can refer to those of Dy 3 Fe 27.7 V 1.3 [20] in the following discussions. It can be seen that introducing H as interstitial atoms resulted in improvements for all hydrides R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y in the saturation magnetization at RT compared with their parent compounds owing to the increase in Curie temperature. Hydrogenation also led to an increase in the saturation magnetization at 4.2 K for R 3 Fe 29− x V x with R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, and Dy, except for Tb. Hydrogenation brings about an decrease in the anisotropy field at 4.2 K and RT for R 3 Fe 29− x V x with R=Y, Ce, Nd, Gd, Tb, and Dy, except for Sm. The saturation magnetization of Y 3 Fe 27.4 V 1.6 H 2.2 at 4.2 K is 57.3 μ B /f.u. corresponding to an average Fe magnetic moment of 2.09 μ B /Fe. Hydrogenation leads to an increase of 0.28μ B /Fe in the average Fe magnetic moment compared with that in the Y 3 Fe 27.4 V 1.6 at 4.2 K. The increase in the magnetic moment of Fe sublattice for Tb 3 Fe 27.2 V 1.8 H 5.2 might be cancelled by the magnetic moment of Tb sublattice owing to the antiferromagnetic coupling between the magnetic moments of Fe and Tb sublattices, which resulted in no net increase in the saturation magnetization for Tb 3 Fe 27.2 V 1.8 H 5.2 at 4.2 K. The decreases in the anisotropy field of both hydrides Y 3 Fe 27.4 V 1.6 H 2.2 and Gd 3 Fe 28.4 V 0.6 H 6.9 at 4.2 K and RT indicate that hydrogenation decreases the anisotropy field of the Fe sublattice in the R 3 Fe 29− x V x (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) compounds. The decrease of the Fe sublattice's anisotropy field results in the reduction of the anisotropy field for the R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y compounds. The increase of the anisotropy field for Sm 3 Fe 26.7 V 2.3 H 4.8 at 4.2 K and RT may originate from the larger increase of the Sm sublattice's anisotropy field (or crystalline electric field coefficient A 0 2 ) after hydrogenation, like that in Sm 3 (Fe,Ti) 29 N y [7,38] . 4 Conclusions A systematic study on the phase formation, crystallographic properties and intrinsic magnetic properties of the hydrides R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy) has been performed in this work. The lattice constants a, b , and c and the unit cell volume V of R 3 Fe 29− x V x and R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y decreases with increasing rare-earth atomic number from Nd to Dy, except for Ce, reflecting the lanthanide contraction. Hydrogenation leads to regular anisotropic expansions mainly along the a - and b -axes rather than along the c -axis for each hydride. This result indicates that the hydrogen atoms mainly occupy the 4i and 4f sites which are located in the basal plane referred to the 1 : 5 cell. The lattice constants of a, b , and c of Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 H 6.5 , like those in Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 , are unusually smaller than that of the R 3 Fe 29− x V x H y (R=Nd and Sm). Abnormal crystallographic and magnetic properties indicate that the Ce ion is non-triply ionized. Hydrogenation leads to an increase both in the Curie temperature for each compound and in the saturation magnetization at 4.2 K and RT for R 3 Fe 29− x V x with R=Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, and Dy, except for Tb. Hydrogenation results in a decrease in the anisotropy field at 4.2 K and RT for R 3 Fe 29− x V x with R=Y, Ce, Nd, Gd, Tb, and Dy, except for Sm. An increase of 0.28 μ B /Fe in the average Fe magnetic moment is achieved for Y 3 Fe 27.4 V 1.6 H 2.2 compared with that in its parent compound at 4.2 K. The decreases in the anisotropy field of both Y 3 Fe 27.4 V 1.6 H 2.2 and Gd 3 Fe 28.4 V 0.6 H 6.9 at 4.2 K and RT indicate that hydrogenation decreases the anisotropy field of the Fe sublattice in the R 3 Fe 29− x V x compounds. The Ce 3 Fe 27.5 V 1.5 and Gd 3 Fe 28.4 V 0.6 , showing the larger content of hydrogen with y =6.5 and 6.9 in these hydrides, can be considered as interesting candidates for further investigation in order to develop new hydrogen storage media. Acknowledgements Project supported by the State Committee of Science Technology and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and in part by the CNPq-Brazil, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and National Key Laboratory of Theoretical Computational Chemistry, Jilin University. References [1] S.J. Collocott, R.K. Day, J.B. Dunlop, R.L. Davis, Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Magnetic anisotropy and Coercivity in Rare-Earth-Transition Metal Alloys, Canberra, 1992, ed. Hi-Perm Laboratory, Research Center for Advanced Mineral and Material Procession, University of Western Australia, p. 437. [2] Ye V Shcherbakova G.V Ivanova A.S Yermolenko Ye V Belozerov V.S Gaviko J. Alloys Compounds 182 1992 199 [3] H.S Li J.M Cadogan R.L Davis A Margarian J.B Dunlop Solid State Commun. 90 1994 487 [4] O Kalogiro V Psychairs L Saettas D.N Niarchos J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 146 1995 335 [5] W.B Yelon Z Hu J. Appl. Phys. 79 1996 1330 [6] Z Hu W.B Yelon O Kalogiro V Psychairs J. Appl. Phys. 80 1996 2955 [7] F.M Yang B Nasunjilegal J.L Wang J.J Zhu W.D Qin N Tang R.W Zhao B.P Hu Y.Z Wang H.S Li J. Phys. Condens. Matter 7 1995 1679 [8] B.P Hu G.C Liu Y.Z Wang B Nasunjilegal R.W Zhao F.M Yang H.S Li J.M Cadogan J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6 1994 L197 [9] B.P Hu G.C Liu Y.Z Wang B Nasunjilegal N Tang F.M Yang H.S Li J.M Cadogan J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6 1994 L595 [10] C.D Fuerst P.E Pinkerton J.F Herbst J. Appl. Phys. 76 1994 6144 [11] D.H Ryan J.M Cadogan A Margarian J.B Dunlop J. Appl. Phys. 76 1994 6150 [12] A Margarian J.B Dunlop R.K Day W Kalceff J. Appl. Phys. 76 1994 6153 [13] B Nasunjilegal F.M Yang J.J Zhu H.Y Pan J.L Wang W.D Qin N Tang B.P Hu Y.Z Wang H.S Li J.M Cadogan Acta Phys. Sin. 5 1996 544 [14] L Morellon P.A Algarabel M.R Ibarra J Kamarád Z Arnold L Pareti F Albertini A Paoluzi J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 150 1994 L285 [15] M.R Ibarra L Morellon J Blasco L Pareti P.A Algarabel J Garcı̀a F Albertini A Paoluzi J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6 1994 L717 [16] H.S Li D Courtois J.M Cadogan J.M Xu S.X Dou J. Phys. Condens. Matter 6 1994 L771 [17] F.M Yang X.F Han F.R de Boer H.S Li J. Phys. Condens. Matter 9 1997 1339 [18] Ye V Shcherbakova G.V Ivanova M.I Bartashevich V.I Khrabrov Ye V Belozerov J. Alloys Compounds 240 1996 101 [19] K Koyama H Fujii S Suzuki J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 161 1996 118 [20] X.F Han F.M Yang H.G Pan Y.G Wang J.L Wang H.L Liu N Tang R.W Zhao H.S Li J. Appl. Phys. 81 1997 7450 [21] X.F Han F.M Yang J.J Zhu H.G Pan Y.G Wang J.L Wang N Tang R.W Zhao J. Appl. Phys. 81 1997 3248 [22] D Courtois H.S Li J.M Cadogan IEEE Trans. Magn. 33 1997 3844 [23] O Kalogiro V Psychairs M Gjoka D Niarchos C.D Fuerst J. Appl. Phys. 79 1996 5539 [24] S Suzuki S Suzuki M.K Awasaki IEEE Trans. Magn. 31 1995 3695 [25] X.F Han H.G Pan H.L Liu F.M Yang Y.W Zheng Phys. Rev. B 56 1997 8867 [26] C.D Fuerst P.E Pinkerton J.F Herbst J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 129 1994 L115 [27] H.G Pan F.M Yang C.P Chen X.F Han N Tang J.F Hu J.L Wang R.W Zhao K Zhou Q.D Wang J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159 1996 352 [28] H.G Pan F.M Yang C.P Chen X.F Han N Tang Q.D Wang J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 161 1996 177 [29] H.G Pan F.M Yang C.P Chen N Tang X.F Han Q.D Wang J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 163 1996 221 [30] H.G Pan F.M Yang Y Chen X.F Han N Tang C.P Chen Q.D Wang J. Phys. Condens. Matter 9 1997 2499 [31] Jing-Kui Liang et al., to be published. [32] K.H Müller J.B Dunlop A Handstein B Gebel P.A.P Wendhausen J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 157/158 1996 117 [33] X.F Han F.M Yang Q.S Li M.C Zhang S.Z Zhou J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10 1998 151 [34] X.F Han F.M Yang H.G Pan Y.G Wang Y.Z Wang J. Appl. Phys. 83 1998 4366 [35] Y.Z Wang B.P Hu G.C Liu H.S Li X.F Han C.P Yang J. Phys. Condens. Matter 9 1997 2787 [36] Y.Z Wang B.P Hu G.C Liu H.S Li X.F Han C.P Yang J. Phys. Condens. Matter 9 1997 2793 [37] G Asti F Bolzoni J. Appl. Phys. 58 1985 1924 [38] H.S Li D Courtois J.M Cadogan J. Appl. Phys. 79 1996 4622

Study on crystallographic and magnetic properties of Y1-xDyxFe11Mo and Y1-xDyxFe11MoNy (x=0-1.0)

Crystallographic and Intrinsic Magnetic Properties of Nd1−xDyxFe10.5Mo1.5 Compounds and Their Nitrides (X=0.0−1.0)

Structural and magnetic properties of hydrides R3Fe29-xVxHy (R = Y, Ce, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, and Dy)

Magnetic properties of the Y3(Fe,Mo)29Nx nitride

Magnetic Properties Of Rfe10.5mo1.5cx And Their Nitrides

Structure and magnetic properties of Y(Fe1−xMnx)12 compounds and their nitrides (x = 0.2 and 0.4)

Structure and magnetic properties of (PrxDy1−x)Fe10.5V1.5 compounds and their nitrides

Study Of The Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy Of Yfe(12-X)Mo(X) And Yfe(12-X)Mo(X)N(Y) (X=1-3, Y-Similar-Or-Equal-To-1)

A Study of the Crystallographic and Magnetic Properties of Dy1−xYxFe11Mo (X=0–1.0)

Structure And Magnetic-Properties Of Rfe(11.35)Nb(0.65) And Rfe(11.35)Nb(0.65)N(Y) (R=Y, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, And Lu)

Variation Of Magnetic-Properties As A Function Of Mo Content In The Rfe(12-X)Mo(X) Series And Their Nitrides (R=Y, Nd, Gd)

Crystallographic and Magnetic Properties of R3Fe29-xTx and Their Nitrides, Carbides and Hydrides

Magnetic phase transitions and magnetic properties of nd3(fe, mo)29 compound and its nitride

Effects of combined substitution of Dy and Mo or Si on the crystal structures and magnetic properties of Nd 1− y Dy y Fe 11− x TiM x (M = Mo, Si) compounds

Magnetocrystalline Anisotropy of TbTiFe11N1−δ and DyTiFe11N1−δ

Magnetic and magnetostrictive properties in high-pressure synthesized Dy1−xPrxFe1.9(0≤x≤1) cubic Laves alloys

Crystallographic and magnetic properties of DyFe12-xMox (1.00 ≤ x ≤ 2.75)

Magnetic-Properties of New Series R-Mo-Fe Nitrides with the Thmn12-Type Structure at A Lower Mo Content

Magnetic Properties of Melted ThMn 12 -Type Carbides and Their Nitrides

Magnetic Properties of Nd(Fe1-xCox)10.5M1.5 (m=mo and V) and Their Nitrides

Magnetic Properties of Y/sub X/dy/sub 1-X/fe/sub 11.35/nb/sub 0.65/ and Their Carbides