Abstract:Background Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the principal method for treatment of high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The transperitoneal approach is associated with poor disease progression, but the distal ureter-bladder cuff (DUBC) resection through retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach is difficult. This study proposed a modulated RNU technique, namely, total retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (tRLRNU), with its advantages of DUBC resection and requiring fewer trocars etc. The efficiency, safety, and short-term impacts were retrospectively compared with total transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (tTLRNU). Methods Total of 12 patients who received tRLRNU and 28 patients who received tTLRNU were enrolled. The choice of surgical approach was random and their data were retrospectively analyzed. During tRLRNU, the laparoscope was versed towards the caudal direction and a retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy was performed. The bladder cuff was entirely transected and the bladder incision was sutured. The tRLRNU cases were compared with the tTLRNU cases in terms of general clinical data, pathologic parameters, peri-operative parameters, adjuvant therapy, and short-term outcomes. The independent samples t-tests, chi-square tests, and Fischer exact tests were used to analyze the differences. Results There were no significant differences in the basic patient characteristics between the 2 groups. The data were comparable. There were significantly fewer trocars utilized in tRLRNU group compared to tTLRNU group (P=0.0008). tRLRNU group experienced less blood loss (98.33±61.32 versus 170.71±121.32 mL; P=0.017), smaller drainage volume (182.08±163.60 versus 1,924.82±3,370.02 mL; P=0.011), and shorter extubation time (5.67±1.07 versus 8.57±6.96 days; P=0.040) compared to tRLRNU group. There were no statistically differences in the other peri-operative parameters, including whole operation time, transfusion, visceral and vascular injuries, open conversion, post-operative bleeding, recovery time of intestinal function, and discharge time. The patient outcomes in tTLRNU group at 6 months were significantly worse than that of tRLRNU group by comparing progression-free survival, progression survival and mortality (P=0.039). Conclusions The tRLRNU was potentially safer, minimally invasive, and more effective compared to the tTLRNU. Due to the small sample size, short follow-up time and no randomization of the study, future comparative studies are warranted to further analyze long-term outcomes of tRLRNU.

Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a meta-analysis of safety and efficiency

Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: a Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for renal tumor:report of 15 cases

Comparison of clinical outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy

Tumor Enucleation Vs. Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a double-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial

Comparative study between robotic-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and retroper-itoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in treatment of early renal carcinoma

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches

Clinical Efficacy Evaluation of Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy

Clinical Comparison of Retroperitoneal and Transperitoneal Approach of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Comparison of Outcomes Between Partial and Radical Laparoscopic Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors Larger Than Four Centimeters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Retroperitoneal robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a matched comparison of perioperative outcomes of a single surgeon

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy and Open Nephrectomy for Radical Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Comparison of Clinical Outcomes

Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach in robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy, which one is better?

Comparison of different surgical treatment of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma

Initial Satisfying Experience of Total Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy: a Retrospective Comparative Research

Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A Retrospective, Multi-Center, Comparative Study

Oncologic Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Treating Patients with Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study