Abstract:Our finite element analysis research revealed that anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) can preserve a similar spinal stability to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), which is far more satisfying than anterior cervical corpectomy decompression and fusion (ACCF). ACAF also showed a lower risk of internal fixation failure and cage subsidence than ACCF, while higher rates of subsidence, screw loosening and internal fixation failure might still be detected when compared with ACDF, especially in axial rotation. Purpose Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy poses significant challenges in selecting optimal surgical approaches, warranting a comprehensive understanding of their biomechanical impacts. Given the lack of consensus regarding the most effective technique, this study aims to fill this critical knowledge gap by rigorously assessing and comparing the biomechanical properties of three distinct surgical interventions, including anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF), anterior cervical corpectomy decompression and fusion (ACCF), and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The study offers pivotal insights to enhance treatment precision and patient outcomes. Methods The construction of the cervical spine model involved a detailed process using CT data, specialized software (Mimics, Geomagic Studio, and Hypermesh) and material properties obtained from prior studies. Surgical instruments were modeled (titanium mesh, anterior cervical plate, interbody cage, and self‐tapping screws) to simulate three surgical approaches: ACAF, ACCF, and ACDF, each with specific procedures replicating clinical protocols. A 75‐N follower load with 2 Nm was applied to simulate biomechanical effects. Results The range of motion decreased more after surgery for ACAF and ACDF than for ACCF, especially in flexion and lateral bending. ACCF have higher stress peaks in the fixation system than those of ACAF and ACDF, especially in flexion. The maximum von Mises stresses of the bone–screw interfaces at C3 of ACCF were higher than those of ACAF and ACDF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the bone–screw interfaces at C6 of ACDF were much higher than those of ACAF and ACCF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the grafts of ACCF and ACAF were much higher than those of ACDF. The maximum von Mises stresses of the endplate of ACCF were much higher than those of ACAF and ACDF. Conclusion The ACAF and ACDF models demonstrated superior cervical reconstruction stability over the ACCF model. ACAF exhibited lower risks of internal fixation failure and cage subsidence compared to ACCF, making it a promising approach. However, while ACAF revealed improved stability over ACCF, higher rates of subsidence and internal fixation failure persisted compared to ACDF, suggesting the need for further exploration of ACAF's long‐term efficacy and potential improvements in clinical outcomes.

Advances in research on anterior cervical fusion and replacement in vitro biomechanical experiment

Cervical Total Disc Replacement is Superior to Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials

Biomechanics of Artificial Disc Replacements Adjacent to a 2-Level Fusion in 4-Level Hybrid Constructs: an in Vitro Investigation

Biomechanics of Hybrid Anterior Cervical Fusion and Artificial Disc Replacement in 3-Level Constructs: an in Vitro Investigation.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Intervertebral Fusion Process After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Biomechanical Characteristics of a Three-Level Cervical Disc Hybrid Construct: an in Vitro Investigation

In vitro study on biomechanical comparison between cervical arthroplasty and fusion

An Overview of Recent Advances in Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Surgery

Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement in Cervical Spondylosis

Clinical application of artificial lumbar disc replacement:Present and future

Biomechanical properties of a novel cervical spine implant with elastic deformation: a cadaveric study

Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy Decompression and Fusion, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, and Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion in the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanics of a novel artificial cervical vertebra from an in vivo caprine cervical spine non-fusion model

Research method and progresses of biomechanical properties of human spine

An update of interbody cages for spine fusion surgeries: from shape design to materials

Effect of different methods of anterior cervical surgery on postoperative instant stability

Biomechanical properties of a novel nonfusion artificial vertebral body for anterior lumbar vertebra resection and internal fixation

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Vitro

Biomechanical Comparison of One- and Two- Level Cervical Arthroplasty Versus Fusion

Effects of New Cage Profiles on the Improvement in Biomechanical Performance of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis

Cervical kinematics following cervical intervertebral disc replacement:Validation of 55-case data