Abstract:Three‐level hybrid surgery (HS) consisting of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been partly used for the treatment of multi‐level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). According to the different numbers and locations of CDAs and ACDFs, three‐level HS has several constructs. Few studies have concerned the von Mises stress on the prostheses, and no study had explored the von Mises stress on the vertebrae. However, the complications related to the implants and the collapsibility of the surgical vertebral bodies had been reported in multi‐level anterior cervical spine surgery. Thus, it is necessary to explore the biomechanical effects on the prostheses and vertebrae in three‐level HS. As a result, we found the stress on CDA prostheses in CDA‐ACDF‐CDA construct and the stress on ACDF prostheses in CDA‐ACDF‐CDA and ACDF‐CDA‐ACDF constructs were significantly increased. But the stress on vertebrae were lower compared with that in three‐level ACDF. Purpose Three‐level hybrid surgery (HS) consisting of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been partly used for the treatment of multi‐level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The complications related to the implants and the collapse of the surgical vertebral bodies had been reported in multi‐level anterior cervical spine surgery. Thus, this study aimed to explore the biomechanical effects on the prostheses and vertebrae in three‐level HS. Methods A FE model of cervical spine (C0‐T1) was constructed. Five surgical models were developed. They were FAF model (ACDF‐CDA‐ACDF), AFA model (CDA‐ACDF‐CDA), FFF model (three‐level ACDF), SF model (single‐level ACDF), and SA model (single‐level CDA). A 75‐N follower load and 1.0‐N·m moment was applied to produce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Results Compared with the intact model, the range of motion (ROM) of total cervical spine in FAF model decreased by 34.54%, 54.48%, 31.76%, and 27.14%, respectively, in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, which were lower than those in FFF model and higher than those in AFA model. The ROMs of CDA segments in FAF and AFA models were similar to the intact model and SA model. Compared with the intact model, the ROMs at C3/4 segment in FFF model increased from 5.71% to 7.85%, and increased from 5.31% to 6.81% at C7/T1 segment, following by FAF model, then the FAF model. The maximum interface pressures of the Prestige‐LP in FAF model were similar to SA model, however the corresponding values were increased in AFA model. The maximum interface pressures of the Zero‐P were increased in FAF and AFA model compared with those in SF and FFF models. The stress was mainly distributed on the screws. In AFA model, the maximum pressures of the ball and trough articulation in superior and inferior Prestige‐LP were all increased compared with those in SA and FAF model. In FFF model, the maximum pressures of the vertebrae were higher than those in other models. The stress was mainly distributed on the anterior area of the vertebral bodies. Conclusions HS seemed to be more suitable than ACDF for the surgical treatment of three‐level CDDD in consideration of the biomechanical effects, especially for the two‐level CDA and one‐level ACDF construct. But a more appropriate CDA prosthesis should be explored in the future.

Biomechanical Characteristics of a Three-Level Cervical Disc Hybrid Construct: an in Vitro Investigation

Biomechanics of Hybrid Anterior Cervical Fusion and Artificial Disc Replacement in 3-Level Constructs: an in Vitro Investigation.

Biomechanics of Artificial Disc Replacements Adjacent to a 2-Level Fusion in 4-Level Hybrid Constructs: an in Vitro Investigation

Finite Element Model Analysis of Lumbar Biomechanical Characteristics after Nucleus Discectomy

Coupled Motion of Cervical Spine in Three Level Hybrid Constructs.

Coupled motion of cervical spine in three level hybrid constructs

Biomechanical Comparison of One- and Two- Level Cervical Arthroplasty Versus Fusion

The appropriate hybrid surgical strategy in three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis

Hybrid Constructs for Performing Three-level Hybrid Surgery: A Finite Element Study

In vitro study on biomechanical comparison between cervical arthroplasty and fusion

Biomechanical Analysis of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement With a Stand-alone U-shaped Disc Implant.

Biomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery

Biomechanical Effects on the Prostheses and Vertebrae of Three‐Level Hybrid Surgery: A Finite Element Study

Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of cervical disc replacement and fusion hybrid surgery with various geometry of ball-and-socket artificial disc

Finite Element Analysis Of Cervical Arthroplasty Combined With Fusion Against 2-Level Fusion

Finite element analysis of optimized novel additively manufactured non-articulating prostheses for cervical total disc replacement

Prosthesis and Hybrid Strategy Consideration for Treating Two-level Cervical Disc Degeneration in Hybrid Surgery

Incorporating strategy in hybrid surgery for continuous two-level cervical spondylosis from a biomechanical perspective

Finite Element Analysis of Influence of Axial Position of Center of Rotation of a Cervical Total Disc Replacement on Biomechanical Parameters: Simulated 2-Level Replacement Based on a Validated Model.

[Clinical Outcomes of Hybrid-surgery to Treat the Two-Level Cervical Disease].

Biomechanical properties of a novel cervical spine implant with elastic deformation: a cadaveric study