The Advantages of Small-Size Focus in Ultrasound Surgery

Li Dehui,Shen Guofeng,Bai Jinfeng,Chen Yazhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4757335
2012-01-01
AIP Conference Proceedings
Abstract:The near-field heating which easily occurs in ultrasound surgery is mainly due to the long axial intensity distribution, -6dB intensity length of which is larger than 10 mm. In this paper, we investigated the advantages of a small-size focus with -6dB intensity dimensions of 1 (transverse) x 4.5(axial) mm. First, the near-field safety and treatment efficiency were shown to be improved. A 5x5x5 mm(3) target was simulated using this small-size focus with 1 mm focal spacing. The consecutive sonications were applied without cooling intervals, and duration of each spot was 2 s under ultrasonic intensity of 200 W/cm(2). The lesion was well conformed to simulated target with 89.6% coverage index and 11.8% external volume index, and peak temperature in the plane (1 cm before focal plane) was 40.5 degrees C, showing it was safe. Meanwhile the treatment time was decreased due to continuous sonication. Another advantage of small-size focus is that it can reduce the possibility of bone burning at the far field. Assumed that the muscle-bone interface located 1 cm after the focal plane, the specific absorption rate at the bone interface were 0.25 and 1.28 times the that of focal plane for the small-size focus and common-size focus (-6dB intensity axial width of 12.5 mm), respectively. So the small-size focus shows superiority in ultrasound surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?