The effect of exposure position in coronary angiography performed in a field shelter on the radiation dosage and image quality

Hui-yu SHAO,Ming LIANG,Xiao-zeng WANG,Tian-ming YAO,Jing-yang SUN,Yan-chun LIANG,Meng WANG,Ya-ling HAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2012.10.011
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effect of different exposure positions in coronary angiography which is performed in a field shelter on the radiation dosage and image quality in order to make practical suggestion of dosage optimization. Methods: The dose-area product (DAP) and entrance skin dose (ESD) were measured respectively with standard phantom in nine different exposure positions during fluoroscopy and digital acquisition. The image qualities of coronary angiographs obtained at nine different exposure positions in six experimental animals were compared with each other. The results were analyzed. Results: In different exposure positions, the DAP value ranged from 12.96 to 31.28 μGym2/s and the ESD ranged from 21 403.33 to 71 106.67 μGy/s in fluoroscopy. In digital acquisition, the DAP value ranged from 39.55 to 87.59 μGy/s (10 images plus) and the ESD ranged from 67 647.25 to 212 498.54 μGy (10 images plus). The minimum dose value was estimated in frontal position, and the maximum dose value was estimated in spleen view. Statistically significant difference in dose value existed between the frontal position and other exposure positions (P < 0.05). The mean image quality scores ranged from 3.55 to 3.85. The image quality of frontal position was best, while the image quality of spleen position was worst. The difference in image quality between other positions and frontal position was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Different exposure positions can affect radiation dosage and image quality. During the performance of coronary angiography in a field shelter, according to the surgical requirements reasonable exposure position should be adopted, which can not only ensure optimal image quality but also reduce the patient's radiation dosage.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?