Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose During Intervention Therapy Between Field Shelter and Catheterization Room

SHAO Hui-yu,LIANG Ming,WANG Xiao-zeng,YAO Tian-ming,SUN Jing-yang,YU Xiao-fan,WANG Meng,HAN Ya-ling
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-2595.2012.05.025
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the difference of image quality and radiation dose between field shelter and cardiac catheterization room during intervention therapy.Methods The dose-area product(DAP) and entrance skin dose(ESD) were measured respectively with standard phantom in fluoroscopy and digital acquisition.Six laboratory animals were separately operated on intervention therapy in field shelter and cardiac catheterization room.Three observers used double-blind method to evaluate the digital subtraction angiography(DSA) image.Results The DAP valve of field shelter in fluoroscopy and digital acquisition were(12.96±0.19) μGym2/s and(39.55±0.26) uGym2 respectively(10 image plus test exposure).And ESD were(21 403.33±170.10) μGy/s and(67 647.25±173.12) μGy respectively(10 image plus test exposure).The DAP valve of cardiac catheterization room in fluoroscopy and digital acquisition were(5.20±0.01) μGym2/s and(55.27±4.32) μGym2 respectively(10 image plus test exposure),And ESD were(11 690.00±26.46) μGy/s and(106 430.82±49.57)μGy respectively(10 image plus test exposure).The dose was significantly different between two groups(P0.05),and the image quality was not different(P0.05).Conclusion Intervention therapy in field shelter can reduce the radiation dose compared with catheterization room and guarantee the image quality for diagnosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?