Abstract:It is held that the plaintiff competence of the civil public interests litigation should not be based on the theory of prozessstandschaft but rather an issue of the substantive law according to which who has the right to present the civil public interests litigation. Therefore,legislators should grant statutory departments and pertinent organizationsspecific rights to claim by substantive legal rules. Besides,in order to avoid difficulties to prove and distribute monetary damages and to guarantee the independence of pertinent organizations,the civil public interests litigation should be restrained mainly to theright to claim for non- monetary rightswith exceptions of claiming for confiscation of the unlawful profitsand submitting funds. These measures will be helpful to rectify the malfunctions of free markets. Moreover,to enhance the protection standard of public interests,regulations on expansion of res judicata and prohibition of abusive lawsuits should be complemented. On the whole,the civil public interests litigation bears the function ofpreventive protection and supervision,which coexists with other systems such as the discretionary prozessstandschaft,representative litigations and the transfer of creditor's rights with their respective functions of protecting collective interests of unspecified group and individual rights of several specific groups,as well as realizing claim rights for both massive and small damages of many unspecified groups.

On the issue of Qualification for the Proper Party in Modern Litigation

The Environmental Litigation and the Qualification for the Proper Party

The Public Interest Litigation and Amplifying the Qualification of the Proper Party

On the Proper Party in Public Interest Litigation

Analysis and Reflection in the Theory of Litigant Qualification———The Reconstruction of Litigant Qualification in our state

Research on plaintiff qualification of the environmental civil public interest litigation

The Suit of the Third Party Discharging the Judgment and Litigant Qualification in New Civil Procedure Law

A Comparative Study and Learning from the Qualifications of the Plaintiff in the Environmental Litigation of Public Good——Taking the Example of the U.S.A., India and the EU

The Function and Procedure of the Civil Public Interests Litigation

On the Reconstruction of the Rights Relief System of the Third Party in Civil Litigation: With the Proper Plaintiff in the Suit of the Third Party Outsider's Revocation as the Focus

Standard of Law Interest:the Fitting Choice of the Qualification Standard of Plaintiff in Administrative Litigation in Our Country

The Jurisprudential Problems in the Early Stage of Chinese Litigation

Civil Procedural Duties System in the Modern Society: A Research on the Different Roles of Judges and Parties in Clarifying Facts of Cases

An Analysis on the Involution of China’s Litigation Object Theory

Examinations of the Plaintiff Qualifications in Administrative Cases in the Regulation of the Securities Market

On the Basic Problems of Civil Jurisdiction

The Research of Actionable Scope on Civil Disputes in the Transformation Period

The Question of Standing in Environmental Litigations

Comment on the Perfection of Environmental Disputes Litigation System in China

Examination and Perfection of Consumer Public Interest Litigation System

Autonomy or Compulsion?—Inquiries about the Legitimacy of Compulsory Joinder of Party