Abstract:It is held that the plaintiff competence of the civil public interests litigation should not be based on the theory of prozessstandschaft but rather an issue of the substantive law according to which who has the right to present the civil public interests litigation. Therefore,legislators should grant statutory departments and pertinent organizationsspecific rights to claim by substantive legal rules. Besides,in order to avoid difficulties to prove and distribute monetary damages and to guarantee the independence of pertinent organizations,the civil public interests litigation should be restrained mainly to theright to claim for non- monetary rightswith exceptions of claiming for confiscation of the unlawful profitsand submitting funds. These measures will be helpful to rectify the malfunctions of free markets. Moreover,to enhance the protection standard of public interests,regulations on expansion of res judicata and prohibition of abusive lawsuits should be complemented. On the whole,the civil public interests litigation bears the function ofpreventive protection and supervision,which coexists with other systems such as the discretionary prozessstandschaft,representative litigations and the transfer of creditor's rights with their respective functions of protecting collective interests of unspecified group and individual rights of several specific groups,as well as realizing claim rights for both massive and small damages of many unspecified groups.

Analysis and Reflection in the Theory of Litigant Qualification———The Reconstruction of Litigant Qualification in our state

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

The Analysis of the Circulation of the Operation Right to Contractual Land

Examinations of the Plaintiff Qualifications in Administrative Cases in the Regulation of the Securities Market

Research on plaintiff qualification of the environmental civil public interest litigation

A Comparative Study and Learning from the Qualifications of the Plaintiff in the Environmental Litigation of Public Good——Taking the Example of the U.S.A., India and the EU

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

An Analysis on the Involution of China’s Litigation Object Theory

The Litigant Advantage in Judicial Review

Reflections on Issues Concerning the Basic Principles of the Civil Procedural Law

The Function and Procedure of the Civil Public Interests Litigation

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

A Reflection on the Reform of Civil Litigation Mode:The Perspective of Judiciary Capacity in Solving Dispute

An Analysis of the Psychological State of the Litigant in Civil Litigation and the Countermeasures

The Function and Construction of the Legal Trail in Civil Lawsuit

The Jurisprudential Problems in the Early Stage of Chinese Litigation

On the Procedural Designing of Review Mechanism on Civil Trials

On the Reconstruction of the Rights Relief System of the Third Party in Civil Litigation: With the Proper Plaintiff in the Suit of the Third Party Outsider's Revocation as the Focus

Rethinking and Restructuring Non-Litigation Procedure

Study on the Essence of Litigation——The Internal Logic from Searching Fact to Realizing Procedural Justice