Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

Some Suggestions on Amending Administrative Litigation Law in China

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

A Study on the Administrative Public Interest Litigation System

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

On Amendment of China’s Administrative Reconsideration Law

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Should the Principle of Mediation Be Established in Administrative Litigation

Examination of Several Controversial Issues in the Administrative Litigation Law (Draft)

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

Problems in the Legislation of the AdministrativeProcedure in China

A Re-Examination of the Function and Role of Administrative Lawsuit

Suing the Government under Weak Rule of Law: Evidence from Administrative Litigation Reform in China

On Enlargement of the Scope of Accepting Cases in Administrative Actions

Types of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China and Exploration of New Frontiers

Rethinking and Reconstruction of the Connection Mechanism between Administrative Reconsideration and Administrative Litigation

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

The Analysis Of Administrative Litigation Procedure

Several Issues on the Reform of Criminal Procedure