A Practical Analysis on the Legal Regulation of Medical Malpractice

Wang Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14111/j.cnki.zgfx.2010.05.005
2010-01-01
Abstract:The data and experience from some hospitals and courts in Beijing indicated that only a fewmedical disputes between doctors and suffers were resolved by litigations. Usually,the two parties in medicaltort litigations were extremely antagonistic to each other. The medical record was the only proof that recognizedby two parties,which meant that the proving of fault was actually the initiating and completing of medical appraisement. Presumption of fault should be the principle of liability in medical tort. Damage is the basic fact,and fault is the presumed fact. How the Supreme Court will standardize medical appraisement after the effec-tiveness of Tort Law is worth of expecting.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?