Identification of Negligence in Medicine Malpractice Lawsuit.

HE Huai-wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1226.2005.02.008

2005-01-01

Abstract:Negligence in medical practice comes from violation of applicable standard of care. Such standards in common law of U.S.A have evolved from customary practice to acceptable practice, which accommodate the need of new development in clinic medicine, along with several doctrines governing establishment of negligence in malpractice. As in civil procedure, plaintiff-patient's expert witness plays the role of establishment of the applicable standards of care and the violation thereof on defendant-physician's part. In china, the substantive standards are the customary ones which have several flaws, and in proceeding, there is no such an expert, but the burden of proof of no-fault is otherwise uniformly laid on defendant-physician's part. However, as a matte of both law and fact, the establishment of negligence is dependent upon verification by medical association, which is of paramount importance. The customary standard is in many aspects in conflict with burden of proof and verification system. As to the legal relationship between such verification and the proceeding, the accountability thereof on designated professional group who carry the verification, is open to debate. But ancillary professional witness and the possible professional assessor may shed auspicious light on professional requirement of this type of lawsuit.