Abstract:The current system of liability for medical damage, which has developed along with the on-going of the reform and opening-up of China, has undergone three phases, including the phase of limiting the patients' claim for damages, the phase of increasing the burden of proof of the medical institutions which leads to the defense medical treatments, and the phase of re-thinking and reflection. The current system consists of three double-track systems in the cause of action, the compensation standard for medical damage and the identification of liability, and has a dual structure by differentiating the liability for medical accidents from the liability for medical faults. Such structure reflects the reality of the chaos in the application of law. The draft of the tort liability law provides an opportunity for reforming such system. The basic direction of reform is to insist on the equality of personality and unify the system of liability for medical damage. The basic requirement of reform is to balance the interests of the victims, the medical institutions and all the patients, and the fault liability principle is the best balancer to adjust them. The principle of equality in litigation weapon should be insisted on to balance the opportunities and interests of litigants. Based on these principles, a single-track and unified system of liability for medical damage will be constructed. To realize this construction, firstly, the concept of liability for medical damage should be unified by abandoning the concepts of liability for medical accident and liability for medical fault. Secondly, the liability for medical damage should be divided into three categories, that is, the liability for medical technical damage, the liability for medical ethical damage and the liability for medical product damage, and different imputation principles should be applied in different categories. Thirdly, the general standard of medical fault is the current medical level. Fourthly, the burden of proof in the medical disputes should be scientifically allocated and the compensation standard for personal injury should be unified and limited. Lastly, the nature of liability identification for medical damage should be judicial identification.

Suggestions on medical damage liability related legal problems

Problem and Improvement of Legislation on Liability for Medical Damages

Reform of China's System of Liability for Medical Damage

Discussion on Administrative Accountability on the Medical Side in Medical Damage Cases

A Practical Analysis on the Legal Regulation of Medical Malpractice

Thoughts on medical damage compensation system design

The Reform of Liability for Damages Caused by Medical Treatment in the Tort Liability Law: Its Success and Shortages

Tort Liability for Medical Treatment Administration: What Law to be Applied

Court Decisions on Medical Malpractice in China after the New Tort Liability Law.

Risk management and empirical study of the doctor-patient relationship: based on 1790 litigation cases of medical damage liability disputes in China

Analysis on the Influence of the Current Laws and Regulations on the Doctor-patient Relationship

Analysis on Necessities of Medical Association Conducting Medical Damage Identification

Countermeasure on the dual expert witness model of medical tort liability

Difficult Litigation Issues on Compensation for Medical Malpractice and Trial Countermeasures

The Study of Nature,Condition Important and Impairment Compensation of Civil Liability in Medical Accident

China's criminal penalty for medical malpractice: too lenient or not?

Fundamental Construction and Major Development of China’s Tort Liability Law

[Study and application of legislative changes on liability for medical damage in the Civil Code].

On Methods of Bearing Tort Liability

Studies of Relief for Low Cure Rate Patients Damage Caused by Medical Malpractice

Certain Issues in Enacting Tort Law