Abstract:Due to the joint efforts made by the scholars of administrative law over the past two decades,theoretical frame on determination of administrative decision and revocation of rules has become more mature. The contents of this theoretical frame is that if any mistakes is found in an administrative act that has been established, the administrative organ should follow relevant rescinding rules rather than the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered". However, according to administrative judgments and official replies and answers issued by the Supreme People’s Court, it is clear that the Supreme People’s Court insisted on the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" rather than was influenced by the theoretical frame mentioned earlier. The Court does not alter its view until the case of Jiao Zhigang was published as a guiding case on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette. According to the judgment of the case of Jiao Zhigang, once an administrative act has been legally made and come into force, the administrative act cannot be withdrawn at will, it is binding not only on the affected person(s), but also on the administrative organ itself. However, the relevant judgments made by the courts at various levels show that the case of Jiao Zhigang has not been frequently referred to in the judgments, and the principle of "collecting mistakes whenever discovered" is still deeply rooted. It is possibly because the guiding cases are lacking in practical value and statutory tradition. However, the rules made in the case of Jiao Zhigang are still valuable, and its value has not only represented the impact of the theory on the decisions by the courts, but also acted as a sign of the development of the idea of rule of law.

On the Balancing Method in the Application of Administrative Law

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

Legal Liability of Violation of Obligation on Administrative Law: Between Administrative Punishment and Penalty——Analysis on Article 7 (2) of Administrative Punishment Law

On the Abiding Force of Administrative Action on Civil Adjudication

On the Application of Administrative Doctrine by Judge

A Comparative Study of the Rule of Reasonableness and the Principle of Proportionality

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

The Analysis Of Administrative Litigation Procedure

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts

Boundary Line of Interests Balancing

The Public Deciding Force of Administrative Action and Impairment of Public Affairs

On the Meaning and Basis of Administrative Accountability

On the Legal Restraint of Administrative Private Law Acts in Administrative Benefits

A Research on the Objective Distribution of Burden of Proof in Administrative Litigation

Judicial Review on Abuse of Power by Administrative Authority

Balance and Imbalance in Human Rights Law