Abstract:Misorientation between crystalline grains generated from a solid state phase transformation can be understood according to the orientation relationship (OR) between the parent and product phases, when such an OR is reproducible and unique. Due to the symmetry of the parent phase, the product phase can be related to the parent phase by various crystallographically equivalent variants of the same OR. When a pair of product particles with different variants meet at a grain boundary, the misorientation between the adjacent grains can be determined based on the OR and the symmetry of the parent phase. Misorientations for ideal rational ORs of phase transformations in some systems have been tabulated in literatures, and also, irrational ORs have been reported, with an increasing tendency because of the improvement of measurement technologies. This paper describes in details how to calculate the misorientation of different variants with a general OR. It starts from constructing the transformation matrix for the phase transformation with a rational or irrational OR, from either measurements or calculations. By applying the symmetry operators in the parent phase with the matrix manipulation, the misorientations between different variants have been derived. Since the misorientations are due to the symmetry of the parent phase, the determined values of misorientation angles between different variants are firstly independent of the OR, but the misorientations axes are dependent on the OR. Nevertheless, the final results of the minimum rotation angles usually vary with the OR when the symmetry of the product phase is taken into consideration to derive misorientation angle/axis. The present approach elaborates the quantitative relationship between the OR of a phase transformation and the misorientation between product particles of different variants. It contributes to a better understanding of the cause of the misorientation, and provides simple formulas to determine the misorientations for a general OR. For simplicity, an example of applications of the present approach is given to an fcc -> bcc phase transformation system with the N-W OR. The calculated results are consistent with those got from other approaches. In addition, the number of independent variants with different ORs, such as the N-W, K-S, Bain ORs in the fcc/bcc system is analyzed, by following Cahn and Kalonji approach of superimposing point groups of the parent and product phases. The relationship between the transformation matrix, the orientation relationship matrix and the corresponding matrix in cubic systems is also discussed.

Unified rationalization of the Pitsch and T–H orientation relationships between Widmanstätten cementite and austenite

Pitsch and t-h orientation relationships between widmanstatten cementite and austenite

A New Orientation Relationship Between Cementite and Austenite and Coexistence of Pseudo-Primary and Secondary Dislocations in the Habit Plane

Coincidence structures of interfacial steps and secondary misfit dislocations in the habit plane between Widmanstätten cementite and austenite

A crystallographic model of the {557} habit planes in low-carbon martensitic steels

A Simple Method for Calculating the Possible Habit Planes Containing One Set of Dislocations and Its Applications to Fcc/bct and Hcp/bcc Systems

A Study of a New Type of Deviation from the Kurdjumov–Sachs Orientation Relationship in Face-Centered-cubic/body-centered-cubic Transformation System

Orientation Relationships Between Ferrite and Cementite by Edge-to-edge Matching Principle

Effective structural unit analysis in hexagonal close packed alloys -- reconstruction of parent beta microstructures & crystal orientation post processing analysis

THE UNDERSTANDING AND CALCULATION OF MISORIENTATION BETWEEN VARIANTS BASED ON THE PHASE TRANSFORMATION

Quantitative Analysis of the Crystallographic Orientation Relationship Between the Martensite and Austenite in Quenching–Partitioning–Tempering Steels

Determination of the orientation relationship between austenite and incommensurate 7M modulated martensite in Ni–Mn–Ga alloys

Habit plane determination from reconstructed parent phase orientation maps

Comment on “A TEM Study of Martensite Habit Planes and Orientation Relationships in Cu–Al–Ni Shape Memory Alloys Using a Fast Δg-based Method”

Interpretation of the Orientation Relationship and Habit Plane Orientation of the Equilibrium Β-Phase in an Mg–Y–Nd Alloy

Gold-rutile Interfaces with Irrational Crystallographic Orientations

Optimization Scheme of the Orientation Relationship from Crystallographic Statistics of Variants and Its Application to Lath Martensite

A Parameter Free Double Shear Theory for Lath Martensite

Orientation Effect on Intergranular Fracture Behaviors along Symmetrical Tilt Grain Boundaries in Bcc Iron

Orientation relationships of impact-induced phase transformation in high entropy alloy HfZrTiTa 0.53

On the multiple orientation relationship of the Mg/γ-Mg<sub>17</sub>Al<sub>12</sub>precipitation system