Reproducible Orientation Relationships Developed from Phase Transformations—Role of Interfaces
Serguei Mankovskii,Martin Gogolla,Susan D. Urban,Suzanne W. Dietrich,Ming-Hsuan Yang,Gillian Dobbie,Tok Wang Ling,Terry Halpin,Bettina Kemme,Nicole Schweikardt,Alberto Abelló,Oscar Romero,Ricardo Jimenez-Peris,Robert Stevens,Phillip Lord,Tom Gruber,Pieter De Leenheer,Avigdor Gal,Sean Bechhofer,Norman W. Paton,Changqing Li,Alejandro Buchmann,Nikos Hardavellas,Ippokratis Pandis,Bing Liu,Marc Shapiro,Ladjel Bellatreche,Peter M. D. Gray,W. M. P. Aalst,Nathaniel Palmer,Tore Risch,Wojciech Galuba,Sarunas Girdzijauskas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10111042
IF: 2.7
2020-01-01
Crystals
Abstract:The orientation relationship (OR) between phases related by a phase transformation is often reproducible. This study interprets and predicts the reproducible ORs with a two-stage approach. The initial OR formed at the nucleation stage tends to allow a periodic structure of a preferred state to form in the interface. A matching correspondence of either a one-to-one or n-to-m nature can be specified in the periodic structure. An initial OR will become the final reproducible OR if there is no misfit. Otherwise, a reproducible OR developed at the growth stage tends to permit a singular dislocation structure to form in an interface where the preferred state must be sustained locally. The actual change in the OR is subject to the given material system and the phase-transformation condition. Various singular dislocation structures and their constraints on the ORs are analyzed, with thermodynamics and kinetics applied conceptually. The resulting ORs can be specified by following one or more Δg parallelism rules. A set of workable steps is provided to facilitate the interpretation of observed reproducible ORs. Some unsolved problems are identified, which call for further studies that can quantitatively combine the thermodynamics, kinetics and crystallography of phase transformations.