Abstract:Judicial review, as a form of external supervision, can effectively improve the lack of self-supervision by administrative subjects. Obviously improper as one of the circumstances of administrative behavior, the definition of the academic community, and the “Administrative Procedure Law” and its judicial interpretation of the lack of clear definitions and application standards, resulting in the court in the judicial practice of the application of “obviously improper” as the basis for review of the standard is not uniform and inconsistent application of the problem, judges and Relying on their accumulated professional knowledge and practical experience to determine whether the administrative subject of the administrative act constitutes “obviously improper”, with a greater subjectivity, which may lead to administrative action as well as the judicial trial of the phenomenon of the same case, undermining the impartiality and authority of the judiciary, not conducive to the construction of the rule of law, the rule of law government. Therefore, in order to solve the above problems, the need for the meaning of clearly improper and its judgment standards, standardize the “clearly improper” the scope of application of the basis for review, the establishment of a unified standard of judicial review, but also to continue to improve the administrative case guidance system. Therefore, clarifying its criteria is of great significance to the people’s courts in correctly adjudicating administrative cases to safeguard the lawful rights and interests of citizens and legal persons, and also helps to standardize the criteria for judicial review, and to regulate and limit administrative power.

Perfection of the system of administrative hearing——from the viewpoint of administrative license

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

The Basic Modification Direction of The Administrative Procedure Law——Discussing Article 1 of The Administrative Procedure Law

Analysis on the Functions of Administrative Legislative Hearing

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

The Hearing Procedure in British Administrative Law

On the Judgement of Public Interests of Administrative Requisition

Restatement on the Legislative Purpose of Administrative Reconsideration

On "Refusal to Apply Rules" in Administrative Litigation:Based on the Analysis of No.5 Guiding Case Published by the Supreme People's Court

Reform of Non-administrative Licensing Approval：Reviewing and Responding

Legislative Perfection of Administration Responsibility System

Administrative Power under Human Dignity

Research on Standardization of Administrative License Evaluation

Discourse on the Legislative Improvement of China Administrative Approval System

On Administrative License Conditions

The Significance of Administrative License in Civil Law

The Democratic Limitation and Procedural Justice of Public Hearing

On Administrative License Standard

Sound Governance in Administrative Legislation

Public Policy-Making Hearing:Value and Limitation of Administrative Democracy

Research on Judicial Review of Manifestly Improper Administrative Acts