Abstract:Background and purpose:Intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) is now widely used in the radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but more accurate positioning of patients is required as compared to conventional radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of dose delivery errors that could result from systematic setup errors for IMRT of nasopharyngeal carcinoma on the dose distribution affecting Dimensional conformal radiotherapy(DCRT) treatments according to simulated systematic setup errors by moving the isocenter. Methods:Eight patients with IMRT and DCRT plan were evaluated to assess the impact of systematic setup errors. The dosimetric effect of systematic error was simulated by randomly shifting the patient isocenter along each of the three Cartesian axes, with each shift selected from a normal distribution. Systematic setup error of 2 mm and 5 mm were simulated. For each dose calculation, we analyzed the ratio of each dose evaluation index to the normal plan used for real time treatment and compared the sensitivity of DCRT and IMRT to setup errors. Results:Frequency distribution showed that simulating systematic setup error with 5 mm resulted in 4.2% of GTV98 and 12.5% of CTV95 with the dose reduction of more than 3%, whereas simulating systematic setup error with 2 mm resulted in having no more than 3% dose error in IMRT. For DCRT, neither simulated systematic error with 5 mm nor with 2 mm resulted in having more than 3% dose error. With 5 mm systematic setup error, the dose of critical organs increased with 10.4% for spinal cord, 14.6% for brain stem, 31.2% for left parotid and 25% for right parotid with more than 10% dose distribution different from real time treatment planning, and with 2 mm systematic setup error, the dose of critical organs increased only with 6.3% for spinal cord, 4.2% for brain stem, there were more than 5% dose distribution difference, 12.5% for left parotid and 8.3% right parotid with more than 10% dose distribution different from real time treatment. However, in DCRT with 5mm systematic setup error, only 10.4% for spinal cord, 6.3% for brain stem were documented with more than 5% dose distribution different from real time treatment, there was no significant increase in the dose of left parotid and right parotid. For both targets and critical organs, comparing IMRT with DCRT, the mean percent dose change of the simulated structure dose in terms of the normal plan was more sensitive to IMRT(P<0.05). the higher the systematic setup error, the more significant the impact on dose distribution(P<0.05). Conclusions:The higher systematic setup error induced more significant dose error. For both targets and critical organs, IMRT was more sensitive to systematic setup error than DCRT. For IMRT, GTV was more sensitive to patient positioning than CTV and parotids were more sensitive to patient positioning than spinal cord and brain stem.

Setup Verification Using Electronic Portal Imaging for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Electronic Portal Imaging Device in the Real-Time Correction of Setup Error in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

EPID for Set-up Errors Analysis and Quality Assurance of Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer

Effects of error on dose of target region and organs at risk in treating nasopharynx cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy

Clinical Feasibility of Using an Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Position Verification During Conventional Radiotherapy

Effects of the Setup Error on the Physics Dose for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing the Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Systematic setup errors for intensity modulated radiation therapy in the nasopharyngeal carcinoma:effect on dose distribution

Comparison of Set-Up Errors Detected by EPID and CBCT Using Two Different Immobilization ;techniques for Patients with Nasopharygeal Carcinoma

Source error acquisition of EPID in static intensity modulated radiation therapy

The Preliminary Study of Setup Errors' Impact on Dose Distribution of Image Guide Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

A Clinical Evaluation of Setup Errors in IMRT Using Cone Beam CT for Head and Neck Cancer

[Measurement of Setup Error in Conformal Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma].

A comparision of three imaging modalities in image-guided radiotherapy

Analysis of Position Verification Result of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Thoracic Tumors by Simulator

Megavoltage cone-beam CT in the evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck cancers treated with precision radiotherapy

A method for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT and VMAT based on electronic portal imaging device

Preliminary Results on In-Vivo Dose Measurement of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer

Research on the correction method for radiotherapy verification plans based on displaced electronic portal imaging device

Set-up errors in three-dimensional conformal/intensity-modulated radiation therapy measured with repeat CT scans for reducing taget volume

Positioning Errors of the Conventional Method in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy: A Clinical Study of an Optical Patient Position Guidance System

Evaluation of Set-up Errors for 493 Patients by Simulator