Nber Working Paper Series Social Ties and Favoritism in Chinese Science
Raymond Fisman,Jing Shi,Yongxiang Wang,Rong
2017-01-01
Abstract:We study favoritism via hometown ties, a common source of favor exchange in China, in fellow selection of the Chinese Academies of Sciences and Engineering. Hometown ties to fellow selection committee members increase candidates' election probability by 39 percent, coming entirely from the selection stage involving an in-person meeting. Elected hometown-connected candidates are half as likely to have a high-impact publication as elected fellows without connections. CAS/CAE membership increases the probability of university leadership appointments and is associated with a US$9.5 million increase in annual funding for fellows' institutions, indicating that hometown favoritism has potentially large effects on resource allocation. Raymond Fisman Department of Economics Boston University 270 Bay State Road, 304A Boston, MA 02215 and NBER rfisman@bu.edu Jing Shi RMIT University 445 Swanston Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia jing.shi@rmit.edu.au Yongxiang Wang Marshall School of Business University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089 Yongxiang.Wang@marshall.usc.edu Rong Xu Renmin University of China 59 Zhongguancun St. Haidian, Beijing China xurongfsi@126.com A online appendix is available at http://www.nber.org/data-appendix/w23130 Economists have long considered the consequences of rent-seeking and the resultant allocative inefficiency for economic growth. Earlier work has focused on the misallocation of capital (human or physical) in production (e.g., Murphy et al. (1991), Acemoglu (1995)). However, endogenous growth models, starting with Romer’s (1986) landmark paper, emphasize knowledge production as the source of increasing returns required to generate growth in the long run. Consequently, rent-seeking and distortions in knowledge production – a topic that has seen relatively little discussion or empirical analysis – is of particular relevance to models of economic growth and development. In this paper, we provide an empirical analysis of distortions in knowledge production. Our focus is on favoritism and the allocation of scientific talent in China. The setting is of particular relevance because of the increasingly prominent role that China plays in the global economy, and because of concerns over the long-term viability of Chinese economic growth (Zhu (2012)). The importance of scientific innovation for sustained growth is well-recognized by the Chinese government. As part of its strategy for economic development, the country has channeled over a trillion dollars into promoting scientific education and research over the past two decades (China Statistical Yearbooks of Science and Technology, 1996-2014). R&D expenditure has grown at an annual rate of more than 20 percent in recent years, and China is currently second only to the U.S. in R&D spending (Ni (2015)). Press accounts have argued that some of this expenditure has been misdirected as a result of favoritism and corruption. These stories implicate scholars and officials at the very highest levels. For example, in a widely-reported embezzlement case in 2014, Ning Li, a fellow of the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE) was among those convicted of misappropriating funds of 20 million RMB (3.17 million dollars). Corruption is thought to extend to the fellow selection process of the CAE and its more prestigious sister organization, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Membership in the CAS confers considerable prestige (the title of CAS fellow is the highest official honor for Chinese scientists), as well as privileged access “Scientists caught in Chinese anti-corruption sweep,” Nature, October 16, 2014